Dominant Players in High-end Audio
During much of recent history, there has been a organization or group that was kind of the standard bearer – which kind of influenced the immediate future of high-end audio: hardware, attitudes, evaluation techniques, etc.
I wonder if this is no longer true – that we as a culture, and especially we as a hobby, have been fractured so much that we are just composed of a lot of different groups, based on some [I would say fantasy] of shared interests – and I ponder if most or all of these are just cul-de-sacs, and lot of niche dead-ends.
In the past [and correct / assist me if need be] we had:
Stereo magazine – Measurements are king
Stereophile – Measurements are still king, but the king is wearing shorts
The Absolute Sound/HP – subjective listening is King
Audiogon – pluralism and shills are king
Audio Asylum – pluralism and nastiness are king
Audio Circle – Discounts, pluralism and disinformation shills are king
…
Lately though, I think none of these sites is any longer dominant. HP reviews and Stereophile reviews and Audiogon and Audio Circle pumps no longer sell that much product. They are no longer guiding the industry.
Perhaps that is because the economy and politics are so dominating the culture these days [the middle class is too poor to buy anything and the wealthy are buying things left and right when they are not scared out of their wits]. So we have lots of very expensive gear and lots of very cheap gear – not much in-between.
And, somehow, the social networks got people hearing lots and lots of opinions, often believing and valuing what a complete stranger tells them.
The only way I have seen out of this mess, this tower of Babble [but better than the old days of a single dominant player!] is to rate things based on many different aspects. Not sure if this would work for Yelp or other rating sites – but we got whole spectrums of lean < --- > warm, dynamic < --- > closed-in, accurate versus non-accurate, etc. etc. and many more which we have talked about and listed on this blog and website many times.
That way instead of ‘it sucks’ we can get ‘it is warm sounding’ and instead of ‘its the best’ we can get them to say ‘it has good dynamic bass’. This would result in the neutering the shills [and the rest of the hyperbole-generating hordes :-)] because, although their goals is to convince everyone that a products is the best for everyone on this and every other planet, all they can now say is, for example, is that it has ‘great dynamics’ – letting all the people who like a more laid back presentation know that this is not for them.
Anyway, our hobby/industry is getting swept up along with all the other more modern industries by what is happening outside the listening room. Sure is fun to watch 🙂
i tend to be a forum whore and frequent audiogon, audio asylum, and audio circle. you’re spot on with your assessments of them…. I couldn’t agree more!
I think the toughest thing we face from the publishing standpoint and you probably to a similar extent as a dealer is to just get people to stop blathering for a while and actually LISTEN. And listen for yourself, not because of what a reviewer like me said or a bunch of pinheads on a hifi forum (who have never owned or heard the gear you’re interested in anyway) said.
They all take it too personally on one level, worrying that they won’t get a system that is “hifi forum approved” or audiophile approved.
Get a system that you love, and find a dealer that you love to help guide you along the way. (and to help set it all up too!)
And while you’re at it, go listen to some live music, so you actually know what instruments sound like… You might be surprised. Hopefully for the better.
Hi Jeff,
Yeah, audiophiles do seem to be a little remiss on actually sampling what is out there before they decide what they like. 🙂
That said, we could all use some gentle guiding when making a buying decision.
As a point of comparison I think about someone trying to find out which high-end audio products they might like compared to myself finding out which wine [or art] I might like.
I know nothing …NOTHING! about wine, except that I have found I like (in my price range) South American wines and that these wines are supposed to have a ‘dirty’ taste – which I guess might be what they call the many, notably un-vinegar-like, interesting flavors in this kind of wine. The kind of guidance I would like in this case might be to know what other countries have wines with this kind of flavor. Are their better wines with this kind of flavor style… and WHY are they considered better. What is the history of these kind of wines and are they all working hard to make their vineyards taste like French wines or are they proud of the way their wines taste. Etc.
I invite people to think about how other industries support, or do not support, the avid consumer: cameras [I did not even know there WAS a thing like Hasselblad cameras until a year ago], stamps, cars, furniture, shoes, etc.
Analogously, in high end audio friendly guidance might be to find a repository of equipment characteristics that points out that a particular brand of speakers is known for their dynamics and ability to go loud, but also their sharp, tipped up treble. So if a person hears them and likes them, and wants to explore other similar kinds of speakers, they should be able to find out what the nomenclature that describes what they they heard and liked and be able to use this to determine what else they might be interested in hearing.
They should also be able to learn the falacies of ‘common knowledge’ like the one, for example, where the more expensive, or more high-resolution the gear is, the more it requires audiophile quality music to be played to have a chance of sounding listenable (i.e. 3-piece Jazz with female vocal).
We are so completely programmed into thinking we should buy whatever is currently popular. If someone is buying wine, or art, for a monetary investment – then defintely, forget the quality and go with the one that has the best marketing and buzz. But audio gear as investment? Well, I guess I’ve seen (and invested in) worse… A lot worse. :-}
Thanks for posting!
-Mike
Dear Mike,
I’ve perused some of your musings and have thoroughly enjoyed the experience 🙂
My spouse and I had the pleasure of meeting you and Neli at RMAF ’09.
Regrettably, we will be unable to attend this year and renew acquaintances 🙁
I wish you the best for RMAF ’11!
I’ll return/frequent the Audio Federation website in pursuit of your ruminations.
Very best regards,
Sam Lucero