RMAF 2010: Wrapup
We came, we saw, we listened, we reported, we come away a little smarter.
We are now dividing systems into categories based on their purpose:
* Boy Toys: systems that are designed to make loud noises
* Gee Whiz: systems that amaze through their use of new technology
* Practical: systems that make music, no fuss no muss
* Drugs: systems that expand the soul and take us to wonderful new worlds
[have to work on the mixed plural and singular cases here]
Previously we have categorized personal basic preferences as points on a linear scale:
* Heart < -----> Mind
And previously we have also categorized system sound as a combination of [more or less linearly independent] flavors:
* Impressive, Natural, Real/Accurate, Emotional, Sweet, Sophisticated and Magical.
We talked about Soul and how many of the ‘touted’ systems at the show were soulless [100% Mind] or Boy Toys.
Next we will talk about:
* Why the industry pushes Boy Toys to the almost complete exclusion of the other 3 types of systems.
* The relationships between the Soulful/Emotional aspect of a system, Heart/Mind preferences and Drug-like systems
(interestingly, there may be no relationship. Emotionally communicative systems tuned to our Heart-Mind preferences may just be there to keep us happy with our system between Drug-like Magical experiences that reveal the deep beauty and mystery of life [kind of like spouses and friends :-)]. In this characterization, good systems are like glasses of wine that are periodically, but infrequently, spiked with something a lot more powerful. For me, this is much more manageable a characterization than systems that are always powerfully Drug-like. Opinions?)
* Methodologies we can use to create Drug-like systems
[and can they be made affordable?
Are they addictive (yes. Doesn’t everybody get the shakes when looking for that new album that will really thrill us, and failing to find it time after time, as the months go by… making us more and more desperate and frustrated? Maybe it is just me…)
Do we need more and more powerful (likely expensive) Drug-like equipment over time? (I think no, thankfully(!) because we can change the music we listen to, perhaps radically, to shock us out of our familiarity. But we need more tests and more test subjects :-))]
* The categorization of small tube amps into various lists based on their performance characteristics (one of which is how well they drive typical speaker loads)
* The categorization of equipment and cables in terms of their usefulness in making Drug-like systems
* The categorization of Drug-like systems
(into beer, wine, whiskey, and other drugs none of us is supposed to be familiar with. Well, we will just all have to pretend we are familiar with these drugs, OK? 😉 In some sense our system at RMAF was like a marathon runners high(?). I have never run a marathon, so I am pretending, extrapolating from the feeling I get after lots of exercise. Similarly we shall invite all of you to help us describe the kind of experiences that you want, and those that you have experienced in the past, while listening to music)
Well, ambitious but really fun topics, I think…
Next show: CES 2011!