Back from CES 2012
Lots of photos, about 4000 I think [we will have an exact number sometime later today] and most will go up on the site: in the Show Galleries if not in this blog.
Stereophile is doing a post for every component – Google likes this sort of thing. But if we do that then this show report will be about 1000 to 1500 posts long. So…. maybe just one post per room?
Yes, I will talk about the sound. And Neli heard a lot of these rooms this year, so I’ll try and include her observations when they do not exactly coincide with mine.
You know, the way I think of the sound of a system is as a list of attributes where the system falls short of ‘perfection’, how far an attribute is from perfection, and in what ways it manifests this imperfection. Sometimes, hopefully, some attributes may be better than ‘perfect’, i.e. they are exceeding the expectations one might have for a mythical perfect system [usually this starts taking into account emotional aspects, or the inherent technological limitations being overcome in some way, etc] .
Problem is that posting the list of attributes where the system falls short of perfection – which is all one can say about 90%+ of the rooms, comes off as being more negative than I would like.
Jonathan Valin’s approach [who is the only other person who talks about the sound] consists of finding something good to say [usually] no matter how vacuous, and then a couple of general negatives [unless he likes the sound in which case it seems it has no negatives]. Besides the fact that his idea of perfection does not attribute as much weight to the subtleties of the sound as mine does, I am just not a person who can make up vacuous positives for bad sounding systems and ignore negatives of the good sounding ones. It’s a curse, I know 🙂
I’ve already tried the film noir detective approach – which came off badly for most people [it was fun for me tho :-)]. And here I am reading another detective novel. And unfortunately this one isn’t Stephanie Plum or Lisa Lutz’s Izzy Spellman, which might be kind of fun to intersect with a show report. 🙂
All this is to say that I will indeed talk about the sound, however, I am just not sure how I am going to put it all yet… 🙂
Yep, I feel your pain, having faced it in the past.
I copped out and led with a ‘top n notable rooms’ approach.
Then I included ‘surprises,’ some of which were negative.
One thing I assiduously avoided: letting exhibitors off the hook b/c of ‘the room’ or ‘the power.’
Good luck!
Bob