Pursuing the Ultimate Music Experiences

Audio Federation High-Fidelity Audio Blog

Brinkmann Balance turntable

One thing about the new categorization scheme here on the blog is that it lets me see where we have been berift of attention with respect to a line of products we carry.

We love all of our lines – which is to say that we love what they do for us, sonically speaking.

So, alhthough we mention them many times in passing, one can see that we only had two posts for the Brinkmann and one for the Walker. We are going to have to fix that.

We’ll start, since tables are SO photogenic and we like taking photographs, don’t we? by posting some pretty pictures:

Brinkamnn balance
The stepup transfomer on the right there is the Audio Note AN-S4.

Brinkamnn balance
The cartridge is the Lyra Titan.

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance
The platform is the HRS M3 Isolation base that was specially designed for the Brinkmann Balance.

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance

Brinkamnn balance

Well, now you all might have a better idea what Brinkmann’s Balance looks like…. 🙂

And, for bigger, larger, more photos, see our Brinkmann Balance Gallery and Brinkmann Balance Setup Gallery.

High-end Audio at CES 2007

Yes, it is that time of year when, instead of dreaming of dancing sugar plums, manufacturers, dealers and motivated audiophiles dream of vast numbers of exotically populated (with audio equipment, …you guys…) Las Vegas hotel rooms.

First, we have to learn to type 2007 and not 2006.

We are, of course, planning on going ourselves. Take a few photos, listen to some tunes.

Will probably still use the first track on Radiohead’s Amnesiac as my test track.

For one, it is seemingly hard for most systems to get the dynamics and imaging right, not to mention some subtle shades of electronics in the midrange.

For another, it is not classical, jazz, close-mic’d female vocals, or pop rock – and so it freaks a lot of people out [but they are so easy to freak out, so not much of an accomplishment]

The ‘main’ ‘official’ part of the show is in the Venetian this year – but I think it is no longer where we will focus our energies – as more and more people migrate to T.H.E. Show.

And, well, there you have it. Any ideas or suggestions about what you would like to see in the show report? Anybody? Or do you want to be surprised? 🙂

Cable Chameleon

Do your friends and neighbors shy away from you when they see your system?

Do you loose track of CDs, and, dare we say it, LPs, only to find them months later hidden underneath the pile of power cords, speaker cable, and interconnects that your system needs to work?

Does your system sound wonderful, better than Carnegie Hall, but give you headaches when you look at it for more than 5 minutes?

Then YOU may be a victom of *Unsightly* *Cable* *Mess*!

Do you look at photographs of all those awesome systems in the glossy magazines wondering why YOUR system doesn’t look like theirs?

Have you tried dealing with your stereo system’s mess by bending and shoving, using your foot to push the cables into place, holding them there for minutes, and longer, hoping they will just stay in place darnit?

Then you may be ready for Cable Chameleon(tm).

Showroom 4
An example of the cable undergrowth threatening to encroach on the listening area and do bodily harm to friendly and not-so-friendly listeners alike.

Cable Chameleon

Cable Chameleon takes care of this problem for you for a fee of $200 / cable.

How this works:

Showroom 1
Here we see an exaggerated example of just what can go wrong when a system has a bad cable day.

These cables were then sent to the Cable Chameleon Laboratories, a division of the U.S. Defense Dept., along with a full color photograph.

The Labs then use recent patented technological discoveries to apply special pigmented substances to the cables.

The cables are then allowed to dry in a hermetically sealed storage room, and then returned to the distressed customer.

Here is what the results are {small print: these results do not necessarily represent what your system will look like after purchasing Cable Chameleon. All cables must be restored to their original position. Improvments in appearance are guaranteed from only one perspective}

Showroom 1
This system looks clean and presentable. Any audiophile would be proud to show this to their significant other’s parents. No longer will you have to throw a towel over your system when the in-laws visit.

System Chameleon

If you think this will not work for you, a subsiderary of Cable Chameleon, called System Chameleon, will take your photograph, photoshop out the cables [a lot better than I did] and then print a poster that contains a life-sized image of your system, without any unsightly cable mess. The poster is then installed between you and the system so that your system looks wonderfully cable-free. NOTE: posters are 85% transparent to all frequencies and can be put in front of the speakers with only a slight performance degradation.

For an additional fee, you can ‘rent’ other people’s system posters…

Would you like to look at a $100K system? a $500K system? while you listen to your somewhat more reasonably priced system? Now you can!

As long as you keep your friends far away from your system – and which of us let our friends get close to our amps while they are drinking a brew? – they will never know that what they are hearing isn’t what they are seeing (especially if they still think Bose is the best speaker ever, or read a lot of posts on high-end audio forums 🙂 )

Speaker Chameleon

Now you too can own a Wilson Alexandria X2, a Marten Design Coltrane Supreme, and Audio Note Sogon… and for the low, microscopic price of $599.99.

For this measily pittance you get two life-size cutouts of the speakers of your choice. Yes, your cable mess remains, but it will be a higher quality of mess and a headache with improved micro-dynamics, imaging, and slam. Just slide one of these 3D likenesses of any one of several of the most sought after speakers over the top of your speaker and BAMM you’ve just performed a massive visual system upgrade.

And, because so much of our brains works off the visual cortex, this upgrade will also improve the sound of what you hear – unbelieveable but true!

[Speaking of which, Cable Chameleon and System Chameleon corporations are headquarted on Triskelian and can only be reached by yours and my imaginations].

Boring

Anyone else bored, so you go cruising the net looking for something high-end audio-ish to read or look at, and end up being more bored than you were when you started?

There is the Social Asylum, or sometimes anti-Social Asylum. Sometimes there is something interesting in the critics section to do with why such and such a component was reviewed in such and such a way. Sometimes.

Then there is Audiogon. As more and more people move onto the net, and discover Audiogon, the percentage of people interested in the Truly High-end diminishes and then diminishes some more. Not to mention the dissapearing thread disease [though I think they are right to delete hit-and-run content-free posts. Whose posters often show up on the Asylum to complain about it].

The All Out Assault (not so virtual) systems pages can be fun, in a kind of purient, peek-a-boo kind of way, as long as one avoid the ones that are trying to sell you something [we just updated our system there – we try hard to avoid saying that everything we have here is the Most Awesome Ever – we may have good reason to believe so, but it seems like bad manners to try and convince people of it in a public forum. How many times does one have to read how everthing else sucks but components X, Y and Z, and, oh, what an amazing coincidence, it is exactly what they now own! And, uh, didn’t they just have the very best stuff just a year or so ago? But then it was all different stuff…and… there should be a hit song called: “somebody needs therapy and it ain’t me”].

Have to admit I like Albert Porter’s system when he talks about music. But most of the time the poor guy has to answer questions from people like “Will my 10 year old Korean cable sound good with the new beta Koetsu cartridge I just ordered from New Zealand?”. I exaggerate to make a point here- but, he needs to add an accelerater key to his keyboard that prints out “How the eff do I know? Why don’t you try it and report back on what you heard.”.

The AVS $20,000+ forum can be interesting – but half of the people there either cannot hear the difference between cables, or they are afraid their fellow forum members will attack them for admitting that they can, so…. the depth of any discussion there is limited. Even so, this has been my favorite board of late.

Romy goes off in a DIY / Equipment Construction Digest tangent which does not interest me at all.

The rest – the rest are usually have a lot of posts about the vague capabilities of specific components that I do not own and am not interested in [I am interested in the very high end and Cool Weird Stuff].

The show reports over at 6moons are the most interesting thing right now. Paris, Vienna, … I like Henk and Marja’s reports, although I bet they are missing a lot of the Cool Weird Stuff I want to see [they missed our room at RMAF].

Have to give Positive Feedback and Dave and Carol a BIG THANKS – they are the only major online mag that covered our rooms, even though they thought our main room was either Peddling Nyquil, or running a game show called Snoozing for Dollars, You Deserve a Nap Today, The Snores of Our Lives, The Young and the Sleepless, …

Anyway, now I have probably upped the boredom ante, boring you all by talking about how boring the net is for bored people.

Retubing the Audio Note M8 phono preamplifier

I was going to call this “Tubey Tubey Do” or “Tu be or not Tu be” but then I remembered how irritating all those cutsey chapter titles can be in those “So You’re an Idiot” books – so I refrained. No thanks are necessary.

Audio Note M8 Phono
The Audio Note M8 Phono preamplifier.

The location of the two output tubes in the M8
The location of the two output tubes in the M8. You can also see them both in the above picture on the left, side, glowing hot orange.

We have heard three different sets of output tubes (a matched pair is required, one for each channel) in the M8 here lately. The current system is the following:

Showroom 4
Marten Coltrane loduspekaers, Audio Note Kegon amps, Audio Note M8 preamplifier, Audio Aero Capitole CD player all on Acoustic Dreams rack and stands with Nordost Tyr speaker cable and Valhalla interconnect, lots of Shunyata power cables.

The tubes had a larger than expected impact on the sound of the M8. Much larger than our experience swapping out the various tubes on the Audio Note Kegon amps:

Audio Note Kegon
The Audio Note Kegon 300B tube-based high-gain 20 watt SET amplifier

The Phillips EGG 5687 tube
The Phillips EGG 5687 tube

In The First Corner

Phillips ECG – very laid back, a little syrupy, lots of harmonic content, some details are missing from the mix.
For me, personally, the Phillips was a little too laid back and there was too much information missing with respect to details in the music.

In The Second Corner :

A perfectly matched pair of GE “five star” 5687’s. [Thanks so much, Mark!] – cleaner sounding than the Phillips , more transparent, more dynamic. Quite romantic.
The GE tubes were quite nice, well-balanced, rich harmonics and I liked the pre when it was in this configuration.

The Tung-sol 5687's
The two Tungsol 5687’s Glowing in Action.

In The Third Corner:

Tungsols 5687 – Amazingly transparent. Images SNAP into focus. Lots more rhythm. Lots more detailed than the other two sets of tubes. MUCH more engaging.
I told Neli “Now the M8 sounds as good as the M10!” She gave me that old sour “Are you NUTS?” look – and I WAS exaggerating in that way that men do around women they like to annoy – but seriously, it was kick ass transparent, by which we mean not just good imaging but excellent convincability.

BAMM! Musicians were … musicianing… in the room.

There was oodles of suspense and anticipation as the music started building to major and minor climaxes.

There was good continuousness, by which is meant in this instance that the notes all seemed to come from the same stage and same instruments – and were not just appearing out there alone, in space, willynilly, strangers to each other.

Very engaging -by which we mean we were drawn to listen to the system at the expense of things we really ought to be doing instead.

A little less romantic and harmonic color than the other two tubes – so the Tung-sol may not be right for everyone. But WE liked it….

But what would be really optimal would be if we could swap tubes in and out, depending on if we are in a deeply romantic mood, flirtatious mood, or sight-seeing mood. Oh. Wait. We can. 🙂

Except that…

… Unfortunately the M8 has to leave us for awhile … sucks.

A special thanks to Peter and Mark for setting it up so we got to hear what we heard. What can be better fun than this on a snowy Sunday? I mean besides THAT.

Our First Newletter

We are working on our first newsletter, which will hopefully go out in the next week or so.

I appears to be shaping up as a kind of “where we are at, where we are going next, what our manufacturers have been up to, with a lot of micro reviews and tongue-in-cheek humor (hopefully you will be able to tell the two apart), and a kitchen sink or three.

You can subscribe at SUBSCRIBE if you have not already.

We encourage everybody to sign up, even if you are one of our daily readers, just so, you know, we will be able to reach you all in case of an *** AUDIO *** *** EMERGENCY ***

[Anybody else miss Johnny Carson and Ed McMahon?]

Not sure what kind of specials we can come up with for the newsletter – if we could, we would just have a special ‘98% off sale’ for all of you out there.

Well, hopefully, Neli and I will come up with something – but it is not really the focus of this first newsletter [the focus is trying to get the mailing list software to actually work without little ole Audio Federation taking down the World Wide Web by some freak accident that causes us to perpetuate a denial-of-service attack on the entire internet – but I, of course, exaggerate the threat… ? … 😉 ].

Thanks, everybody.

Just a few notes

(textually speaking).

* For those that visit us here at our showrooms, let it be known that our work to replicate the grand canyon at the bottom of our driveway has been unsuccessfull (although I thought we were going to make it there for awhile, we got close! 🙂 ) and is now perfectly smooth (my S8 – no, not the AN S8 step-up transformer, the old Audi S8 – is very happy with me now).

* Although we are no longer calling the main category of the blog: The Boulder Befry, we want to assure everybody, one and all, that this is still the Blog:

“WHEREIN THE BATTY COUPLE GO ABOUT THEIR BATTY WAYS ”

That is all.

The Remarkably Similar Sonics of Most High-End Turntables

[This was originally written early this year (with some minor editing in the last few minutes to make less incorrect my English) but was not posted at that time after seeing the Postive Feedback review of the Walker that appeared simultaneously with the writing of this post – making it seem too weird, if not plain redundant, to have yet another piece on this turntable. But since we are discussing these very same reviews and turntable below – maybe it is time to finally get this out of my drafts folder (I have been seeing it for the last 10 months or so, every single time I post anything on this blog… :-))].

There was a lot of chattering and hoopla’ing about the $90K Continuum turntable that was shown at CES 2006.

Then there was more skuttlebutt when Mike Fremer decided to buy one for himself.

Steve Hoffman’s Forum

Romy’s Forum

And now a rumor that Mike Lavigne wants to sell his $70K Sirius III and get one too?

Well, far be it from us to be against people spending lots of money on audio equipment… 🙂 but this is all so strange as we were really underwhelmed by the sound of the Continuum at CES 2006, and I was also underwhelmed by it at HE 2005 (though Neli liked the system there well enough). [P.S. We also later gave the Peak Consult / Berning / Continuum room at HE 2006 best of show, and, though we were still underwhelmed by the table, they had setup a very nice system there]

After CES we both kept saying to each other “what is going on? The Continuum seemed no better than our $20K Brinkmann!”.

At first I thought that I just did not have the experience to pick out the sound of these turntables in a system – even though I can pick out the sound of a digital player fairly well. I mean – $90K – it has to be great, right? But then I remembered what the Walker sounds like in unfamiliar systems. I have always been able to hear what IT is doing.

Then we thought about an even more outlandish idea: that most of the turntables in the $20K+++ range sound a LOT alike.

Then I read on Romy’s site that he is thinknig along the same lines:

The Foolishness of Analog People

What does ‘a lot alike’ mean?

It means that the difference in sound between a component and another is less than or equal to the difference caused by adding or removing a tweak in the system.

But some components out there are different, they do not sound like others and stick out as being something special. For example: Let’s talk about CD Players.

[Let’s not. But you might imagine this could get us all into a lot of trouble – even though the three brands of players we have here all do something special – many out there do not]

It is like Romance novels or Science Fiction movies – one person has a good idea and then a 1000 people copy it.

One might argue that sounding generic is a good thing. And this argument might be interesting.

We chose to carry the Brinkmann turntable because of the exceptional build quality, ease of use, attactive and streamlined appearance, and excellent support network. And, of course, how it sounds.

And as far as value goes – its sonic quality, at $20K, is in the same class, based on all the systems we have heard so far, as the Continuum, $80K Blue Pearl, $75K Vyger, and also the Sirius III if MikeL really thinks the Continuum is better. In fact, I think a really tweaked out VPI TNT is in this sonic class. Sorry.

OK, I can here you thinking out there. Mike Fremer had the Brinkmann, and now has the Continuum, and he says that the 5 times more expensive turntable really sounds better. Well, I am one of the few people who thinks Mike does indeed have ears. But. But his room is broken and his system is broken. What sounds optimal in his environment may not, in general, be optimal outside his environment. Also, as a reviewer, he has other motivations. Nothing sinister or anything – but he is a professional and needs to think about his readers and his career.

If you really want to know the truth, the only turntable we have heard that generates an immediate response of ‘Now THAT is Analog’, no matter what system it is in, is the Walker Procenium Gold turntable.

Now, I hesitate to say that. Lord knows Lloyd Walker does not need more encouragement :-). And we shivver to think we are adding to the overwhelming wealth of disturbingly unbalanced copy on the Walker line on both the Positive Feedback and 6moons sites.

And, like everything else, the Walker does have its issues.

But we have to say it, if you really want something that actually sounds better than anything else out there, that can’t just be achieved by a new cartridge or vibration control device or a better interconnect….then get a Walker.

It is not that there is anything wrong with the megabuck tables that I can see. Someday we may even carry the Blue Pearl or Continuum. They are quite beautiful and impressive.

Let’s put it like this: There is a lot, Lot, LOT more difference between most $20K speakers and most $90K speakers than most $20K turntables and most $90K turntables.

Unless it is the Walker.

Yeah, that is what we wanted to say. Maybe I should just delete the rest?

The Reviewer's Preferences

[Neli wants me to verify that everyone understands these descriptions are, necessarily, characerchers, very short descriptions of what are real people – real people who cannot be described by one sentence, or a million. OK. Now I can tell Neli that everyone understands this, ….right? 🙂 ]

Each reviewer has preferences.

Because they have limited funds they only have limited access to a wide variety of equipment which arrives serially – i.e. they may have had both Lamm amplifiers and Wilson speakers in their listening room – but probably not at the same time. And it would be difficult for them to consciously schedule to have them both at the same time in order to hear them at the same time. So they kind of just hear a lot of components in a hodge-podge random order. One or two at a time. In their existing system, whatever that may be.

So what this means is that although reviewers have access over time to a lot of equipment – their system building is often a long and somewhat random winding road, and they typically do not have a lot of experience with consciously building a system that suits their taste, living with it for awhile, then making a better system, living with THAT for awhile, etc..

[This is unlike the dew dealers who collect best of breed equipment and can freely mix and match to create their Wonder Systems – and unlike many audiophiles who also try lots of various pieces of equipment, although most audiophiles still focus on ONE PIECE of equipment that will finally DO IT – instead of a SYSTEM that will do it – probably because they read too many reviews… which rarely focus on the fact that it TAKE A SYSTEM to sound good].

They also, almost across the board, stay in whatever house they have lived in since they were a child (kidding) and whatever compromised listening room they found pre-existing in that house.

Mike Fremer – Stereophile

MF has reputedly a very small room with severe bass resonance issues. He prefers a very detailed and very neutral sound with tight, detailed bass. His system consists of permanent residences the Musical Fidelity electronics and Wilson Maxx II speakers.
This is all one needs to know in order to predict what Mike will like or not like. He gravitates between preferring of-a-kind equipment (like SME turntables, Rockport speakers) and equipment way over on the other side that balances his system (like Zanden digital and Sonus Faber speakers). He probably will only BUY of-a-kind equipment: neutral to cold, very detailed sounding gear.

Srajan Ebean – 6moons

Srajan just moved – and I believe he has his pick of several rooms to put music in. So his rooms do not suck. He prefers equipment that is reasonably priced, first and foremost, which is fairly dynamic, and eschews sophistication – prefers real but puts up with an ‘affected’ sound – a sound that entertains him. Enjoyable.

His system at one time consisted of Avantgarde Duo horns and, to balance these very forward, harmonic-free speakers and laid back, somewhat dull sounding front end. Equipment he reviewed went into this system with very predictable outcomes [Speakers had to be quite dynamic and not too revealing of the flaws upstream. Components had to be warm and not too detailed or neutral or the speakers would show off their inherent coolness and over-aggressiveness].

He now has the more or less reasonably priced Zu Audio speakers, last I checked – which are a heart pure Enjoyment with some good dynamic capability. These speakers do not like a sophisticated front end (shows off their flaws) and their owner will probably prefer a tube amp or a laid back solid-state amplification.

Srajan will prefer equipment with good value that is enjoyable, and has decent dynamic capabilities, or is interesting intellectually. He will pan equipment that is seemingly too expensive, or detailed, Sophisticated, or boring (from a reviewer’s point of view).
HP – Absolute Sound

HP has quite small rooms at Sea Cliff – ones that he has learned to make the most of.

HP likes a BIG SOUND. His systems are somewhat of a balancing act, much like Srajan. Big, open sounding, dynamic, not very sophisticated speakers (ALON/NOLA, Pipedreams, Wisdom way back when) are paired with amps that are excellent (ASL, Edge), but do not intrude on the overall character of the speaker, with cables that are neutral and not used as tuning devices (Nordost Valhalla), and a very high-quality source (the old Burmester $60K transport and DAC pair, Emmlabs CDSD and DCC2, and the best turntables when he can get them – ignore the Clearaudio, it is just a stand-in).

HP more than any reviewer, consciously builds a system around speakers he likes. Just like we do, and maybe one or two other dealers, and a lot of the audiophiles who consciously build their systems to achieve the sound they want. [Even if you do not have, cannot afford, the speakers you want today – you can think ahead and improve your current system, today, with less expensive equipment – like powercords, vibration control, cables – with a eye on how it will work with your system tomorrow, when you CAN put the speakers you want into your system].

JV – Absolute Sound

JV’s room is kind of unbalanced, last picture I saw, with a door in the front wall. Not aware of any other particular problems.

As mentioned last post – for many years JV’s system sucked, like most reviewer’s systems, but then he got a Walker and then, after the ridiculous underpowered Tenor amp / Rockport speaker love affair, heard the Tenor OTL on the Kharma 3.2 speaker. This is one of those GREAT systems. Finally, a reviewer with a real state-of-the-art system – and one that will fit in ordinary sized rooms to boot.

JV prefers – interesting sounds. Of all reviewers, I think he gets bored the easiest. This is why I think he kind of careens from one relatively good sounding piece of equipment to another, perhaps not as good sounding piece of equipment – because the new piece sounds interesting and DIFFERENT and is entertaining.

So, JV will like things that do not suck and that are interesting sonically. Otherwise he is hard to predict.

———————————-

All of these reviewers must publish in order to put food on the table. They will in general say good things about something in order to not ruffle feathers.

None of these reviewers pays any attention to vibration control, except perhaps JV who has a Walker Audio rack and Srajan who has a Grand Prix Monaco rack.

I think only MF pays attention to powercords. HP just experienced his first diamond tweeter a few months ago.

Most reviewers, and these are no exception, are quite a bit behind the experience curve of most network-savvy audiophiles who have some extra cash to burn.

But I like these guys and we will follow closely and comment on what they have to say.

Reviewing the Reviewers

We are going to start another category…

In this category we are going to discuss some of the reviews that are being published, and discuss them in the context of the reviewer’s tastes, systems, and rooms.

This will not be critical, or nasty, or flame ridden…

It will try to put some of what many people read into a larger context, as we see it anyway.

Since I am the one writing this (I try to talk Neli into posting on the Blog until she starts waving divorce papers in my face [not really – but I bet you know EXACTLY what I mean]) I am going to limit this proess to just a few of MY favorite reviewers:

HP, Jonathan Valin, Mike Fremer, and Srajan at 6moons.

Why are these guys my favorites?

Maybe because they are so powerful they can say what they want (but not so powerful they can say it the way they want to – a steady paycheck [how nice it is!] is a difficult thing to throw away).

MF buys his own equipment and, although erratic and idiosyncratic, he does let the truth slip out once in awhile.

JV has seen the light after the Walker Tenor Kharma experience and now knows what good sound is. What willllllll he do?

HP because he is HP.

Srajan because he is tryoing so hard to do the right thing.

However, none of these people put their reviews into the context of what the rest of their system is doing to color their interpretation of what they hear. Their bright sounding amp on a revealing speaker? That speaker is too bright. A reasonably priced laid back system on a revealing speaker – what do you know: that speaker is too laid back.

We’ll ignore Art Dudley – mostly because I think he is very open about his likes and dislikes – is probably the best reviewer because of it – and, well, there isn’t much to explain about his reviews.

Marja & Henk at 6moons have done some good reviews, IMHO – but I have read too little of their stuff…

Danny Kaye has retired… or graduated… or escaped… whatever you want to call it.

What a good reviewer SHOULD do is be self-conscious [well, first they have to be conscious, but let’s say that is a given], they should keep wondering if they have it right, keep wondering if they have the gist of what is going on with the component, the system, the music. They should keep trying to explore what it is that makes people like music – what makes them like some sounds and not others – what causes cyclical pressure waves to somehow communicate the great ideas and the nature of the human condition to all peoples of all generations.

Just like a good dealer.

If they start talking about how it “has a flux capacitor and therefore has to sound great”, or “it has 6.5 gigawatts of charm, these measurments can’t be beat, this is and will always be the best” then turn the page, hop into your Delorian, and try out the sequel.