Pursuing the Ultimate Music Experiences

Audio Federation High-Fidelity Audio Blog

Why is it that European High-end Audio Manufacturers are Completely Clueless about the U.S. Marketplace?

I mean, many build good products but… well, let’s start at the beginning.

Contrary to most people’s desires, good distributors are experiencing financial problems while the slimy riffraff continue to exist, and are even picking up a few previously respectable European product lines.

Why do the dishonest distributors do better in a bad economy? Because, even in a good economy, they sell stock at or below dealer prices, directly to consumers. So if they need some money to cover some bills, they do what they always do and sell under the table, damaging their own dealer network [putting them out business eventually if the dealers are clueless – need a post about clueless dealers next], damaging the brand name to some extent forever, obliterating the resale value for people who already have the equipment and might want to sell someday, etc.

[They can almost always find someone to buy a component for an ‘unbelievably good price’ – problem is that the consumer does not realize that dozens of other people are getting the same, or even better, price from this guy, and that therefore that is all that the component is worth. And they can wait to see it on Audiogon at half that unbelievably good price as people learn that the brand does not have such a good rep after all – i.e. that it can be bought at ridiculously low prices.]

Good distributors do not do this, which is great in a good economy, because they build brand and are able to keep prices high enough so that they can make money and stay in business, so that a dealer network can exist and people can hear the equipment locally, and people can sell their used equipment when they are done with it for closer to what they bought it for. In general they grow the brand – slowly, but for the long term – and for bigger bucks in the end.

We figure Europeans just think we are one big WallMart, and that we are all dishonest and have no taste anyway 🙂 So, they tell themselves, why not allow it to be discounted heavily, why not let the dealer network wither away – we get ours which is the same amount of money as we would if a good distributor sold the product through a local dealer network, right? Wrong.

Wrong. And it is easy to see why.

First, if someone pays a pitance for something, they are going to sell it for 1/2 a pittance. Everyone in the world then sees what the resale value is on this brand – they ALL visit Audiogon and the other sites – word gets out.

Second, there is a long sales cycle for most of this stuff. If they can’t hear it at their dealer, if their dealer in fact slams it because they got burned by the current distributor, perhaps for a different brand entirely, but burned they are anyway – then this will hurt sales for 5 to 10 years in that dealer’s area and with the people everywhere that the dealer talks to.

Third, once a manufacturer reveals that they are willing to work with dishonest and slimy distributors, this reflects back upon the ethics and character of the manufacturer themselves. The become untrustworthy to good distributors. Who knows when they will ‘blip out’ again and switch to a dishonest distributor when the going gets tough? They are then stuck in the position as a second rate brand [at best]. Good distributors stay around for decades and decades. And they talk to each other. They even talk to us 🙂

Why do I call the bad distributors dishonest? Because they lie to the manufacturer and lie to the dealers. Their business model pretty much starts off with ‘sell into any dealers territory at any price – it is unlikely that they will catch me at it – and when they do, I’ll just set up a different dealer… they are so clueless they do not talk to each other about me, either because they want the other dealers to suffer the same fate, or because they are at war with each other’.

Why do I all them slimy? Because sometimes they sell things to consumers that they do not even distribute – lying to the consumer about support. Sometimes they sell things to dealers they do not even distribute [yes, dealers are sometime more clueless than manufacturers]. They lie just about everything, having a philosophy [as near as I can ascertain from trying to figure out how they can stand themselves] that all is fair when it comes to making a buck.

And so, calling European manufacturers clueless is being charitable, because eventually their lack of interest in the character of the people they deal with will reflect back on them – that they also think “all is fair when it comes to making a buck”. Including making inferior equipment.

Kharma 3.2fe loudspeakers

Our Kharma Mini Exquisites have found a new home, and in exchange we have a nice pair of black Kharma 3.2fe speakers.

Kharma 3.2fe speaker
The Kharma 3.2 are a little skinnier, and not as deep, as the Mini Exquisites, and so it is even more fun to look at this system where the Edge Electronics NL Reference amps are almost as big as the speakers.

Kharma 3.2fe speaker

Kharma 3.2fe speaker

Kharma 3.2fe speaker
The 3.2 speakers do not have the diamond tweeter – and not quite the fit-and-finish of the Mini Exquisites [and remember, ours had the wood caps – oolala!].

Kharma 3.2fe speaker
The 3.2 speakers are easier to drive, and have less finesse, not quite the ultra-high resolution, and not quite the authority of the mini exquisites. At one-third the price on the Minis, their price performance kicks patootie in the high-res 2-way with more than decent bass speaker marketplace.

Kharma 3.2fe speaker
The single binding post, not being in a recessed cavity, unlike the Minis, might be easier, or it might be harder, to attach to a bi-wire speaker cable. Neli has not given me an earful, so I assume easier 🙂

Announcement: Nordost Odin goes digital with dedicated 75 and 110 Ohm leads

Nordost ODIN digital cable

Digital signal transfer is an exacting task that benefi ts from
all the considerations that affect analog signals, but with the
added concern of precisely defi ned termination standards.
Correct digital data transmission demands purpose built cable
solutions with dedicated conductors and impedance-matched
termination. The 75 Ohm S/PDIF transfer standard requires a
single, co-axial conductor, using properly confi gured 75 Ohm
connectors in order to avoid serious signal degradation.
The Odin 75 Ohm digital lead employs a unique, massively
oversized Dual Micro Mono-Filament construction, wrapped
in a Total Signal Control (TSC), “virtual solid” shield, ensuring
the superb geometrical accuracy demanded by a constant
impedance conductor, combined with fl exibility and the
complete shielding delivered by a tubular shield construction.
The choice of Silver NextGen RCA or Furatech Rhodium
BNC connectors ensures that the supremely accurate
transmission performance of the cable isn’t compromised by
its termination, delivering digital data integrity to match the
analog performance of the other Odin cables.
Like 75 Ohm S/PDIF data transfer, the AES/EBU balanced digital
transmission standard depends on closely controlled impedance
parameters to achieve its stated performance. That requires a
separate cable construction, dedicated to balanced mode data
connection, built around industry standard XLR plugs.
The Odin 110 Ohm digital lead corresponds precisely to the
AES/EBU standard, two purpose built Total Signal Control
(TSC) tubes delivering “virtual solid” shielding to the Dual
Micro Mono-Filament, silver-plated solid-core conductors.
The twisted construction and FEP insulation keep the
cable conveniently fl exible whilst guaranteeing superior
dielectric performance and geometrical consistency. Two
independent earth wires maintain the integrity of the
balanced grounding confi guration, ensuring common mode
rejection of spurious noise, while the professional grade
XLR connectors maintain constant impedance across the
cable termination, maintaining the Odin’s accuracy in this
demanding and critical application.

Announcement: Nordost adds Odin Tonearm Lead to complete Supreme Reference line up

Nodrost Odin tonearm cable

The tiny signal levels produced by today’s high-quality
phono cartridges (often with an output around 1000 times
smaller than a typical CD player) require special handling if
their superb but fragile musical qualities are not to suffer
irreparable damage. The capacitance of the leads used
to transfer these signals is particularly critical, requiring a
dedicated cable solution if the full majesty of what remains
the high-end two-channel source of choice for many
listeners, is to deliver its full, musical potential. After all, why
go to so much effort reading every last squiggle in an LP’s
grooves if you are just going to lose that information in your
tonearm wiring?
The Odin Tonearm Lead employs four of Nordost’s Total
Signal Control (TSC) tubes, wrapped round a dedicated
earth wire. Specifi cally dimensioned for optimum
performance with low signal levels, the silver-plated solidcore
conductors are suspended in a Dual Micro Mono-
Filament FEP helix, creating a virtual-air dielectric for minimal
signal loss, while the TSC shielding provides the best possible
protection from external interference in an increasingly RF
polluted environment. And don’t just assume that because
your tonearm is fi tted with RCA output sockets that a
conventional interconnect will be acceptable. This close to
the front of the signal chain, any compromise is massively
magnifi ed, and using anything other than a dedicated
tonearm lead between your record player and phono-stage
is exactly that – a serious compromise.
With so many different connection options available on topof-
the-line tonearms, the Odin Tonearm Lead is available in
a wide variety of terminations and confi gurations. Standard
options include straight and right-angled entry IEJ type
5-pin connectors and WBT Silver NextGen RCA plugs, while
the connections to the phono-stage are also via WBT Silver
NextGens. Balanced confi guration and other tonearm
terminations are available to special order depending on
connector availability. The leads are supplied as 1.25m
lengths as standard, but other lengths can also be ordered.

Shootout 2 – Speaker Cables

[we’ll be adding more photos as soon as I find where Neli has put all the Origo cables :-)]

Speaker Cables 1

OK. At this point we switch to speaker cable shootouts. We compare the ODIN to the PRIME, as the ORIGO was not able to make it to this shootout due to a slight difficulty with respect to someone forgetting to bring it. 🙂


Nordost ODIN speaker cable

* ODIN on the main towers.

PRIME interconnect. Valhalla speaker cable on the bass towers.

Eva Cassidy: Easy, relaxed dynamics. We [Neli and I] are not used to this [we had PRIME on the main towers for 2 – 3 years now]. XRAY Vision – can see into the music more.

Chinese Female Vocals: More dynamics. Open and clear. Less resolution. Less fill (especially on voice).

Radiohead: More realistic dynamics. Better PRaT.

Note the ‘Less resolution. Less fill (especially on voice)’ above. I suspected that this was because the ODIN speaker cable was expecting the higher resolution that an upstream ODIN interconnect would bring to the party [and we have noticed synergy between the ODIN cables and their brethren before]. So we replaced the PRIME interconnect with the ODIN interconnect.

* ODIN + ODIN with Valhalla on the bass units.

Radiohead: Amazing depth. More forward. Jim: less irritating [Jim is not exactly partial to Nordost cables, though he has been tempted by ODIN a few times]. Lots of musical threads to follow with my ears. More sibilance [So say my notes, though on the next song they say the opposite. We certainly killed it once and for all at the next shootout or so [see below] when Dylan was one of our test songs [actually, several Dylan songs – it was wonderful. Yes, even the harmonica :-)].

Chinese Female Vocal: Wonderful, wonderful tone. Less body on the cello. Wonderful voice. The top 1 or 2 experiences I’ve had hearing a voice like that. Less evenly distributed throughout soundstage. Cello had more detail. Better flow. Better PRaT. [did the cables just need to settle? These songs have a lot, a LOT, of sssss’s in the words, don’t they Alex and Teck? :-)]

Eva: Jim: Not engaging. He was right, Eva sounded bored. I wondered if it was just this song, because if we are hearing so far into the song, we might be able to hear that she really was tired of this song – it might be the 100th time she has sung it this year or she is hungry or something. The next song was better; she was more into the song [Bridge Over Troubled Waters]. You could hear that she liked some parts of the song better than others. Is this real? Am I nuts? Or is the system not quite stable and is having weird affects that make the subtle cues as to the mood of the singer kind of random?

I, personally, think it is indeed real. But I am not sure I want to know that the singer is bored. Frank Sinatra was bored from say, 1962 to the day he died [to my ears]. All of his songs sound like he was just earning a pay check. How many other singers also just go through the motions?

—————————————————————–

Interlude. Jorma Design No. 3 speaker cables

—————————————————————–

We later compared the Jorma Design No. 1 [in the Valhalla price and performance range] to their No. 3 speaker cables, their least expensive

No. 3 had less resolution, less body, less fill, less color and less subtleties. But it was a reduction in performance across the milieu that was ‘in kind’ – it still had all that Jorma Design approach to music.

Neli: not as side-to-side stable.

Tone is good. Decay is a little fast, anticipatory pause is a little foreshortened. Imaging a little less precise.

We were really happy with the No. 3’s performance. No bad behavior. It still sounded a lot like the No. 1 [and presumably their No. 2, which is between the No. 1 and the, uh, No. 3], just thinner.

Speaker Cables 2

We kept the Valhalla on the bass towers and ODIN is the interconnect on the crossover. The primary purpose of this shootout is to evaluate the performance of the Jorma Design Origo speaker cable.

Current pricing circa this date for 2.5m (not responsible for errors, blah blah blah): No. 1 $6,485 ($9,800 bi-wire). Origo: $10,300 ($19,825 bi-wire)

* Jorma Design No. 1

[one step below Origo][comparing to ODIN speaker cable, which is on the speakers now, and to a large degree PRIME, which has been on the speakers for years and with which we are very familiar]

Dylan: Soundstage blotchier. Good separation and attack. Harmonic a little bright. Needs more resolution to be less bright.

Radiohead: Thinner sounding. Good presence. No where near as smooth. Much less resolution. Less full – but leaves a nice sense of airiness. Thinner voice.

* Origo


Jorma Design Origo speaker cable

Jorma Kaukonen [I bet Neli just played this to drive me nuts here by having two Jormas to deal with :-)]: The attack and decay was much more fleshed out. I would say ’rounder’ but that has become synonymous with an attack and decay that is sloppy and uncontrolled. This is well controlled and there is lots of resolution within the attack and decay themselves. Fuller. More real. More harmonic color. Images have more body. More resolution with respect to the images hanging in space. Clean. A happy cable like the PRIME. Much happier than the No. 1.

Radiohead: Lighter than PRIME [we will see]. Good drama and anticipation. Thinner? The voice is pretty [by which I must have meant that the cable is lighter on its feet, highlighting the little affectations of the voice as opposed to the guttural and solidity]. Neli: better PRaT. More solidity. Kevin: Subtle transitions more complete and are therefore more emotionally revealing.

More nimble. Thinner. Less fully fleshed out soundstage, imaging and harmonics. [OK, here I am already comparing it to the PRIME, as remembered]

Dylan: Harmonic pretty good. Almost enjoyable [hey, most of this post is verbatim from my notes, including that. I’ve always thought Dylan’s and Neil Young’s harmonics were very difficult to render properly unless a person really WANTED a headache].

We played 3 tracks from Dylan each time during this shootout. on track 3, there is a ‘chuck’ing/scraping of the strings of an electric guitar that was very irritating and unrecognizable for what it was with the No. 1. Later in the shootout, it was much more evident what it was, and there was actually different harmonics hearable within the ‘chuck’ sound itself.

Neli: More PRaT, clarity, dynamics, separation and detail – the more rhythmic lines make beat more evident. [OK. Neli and Kevin (Jim wasn’t here for this shootout) both started giving me long impressions talking very quickly, and at the same time would talk to each other in a manner not loud enough for me to hear what they said (we played all of this shootout fairly loud. We started loud, and then to keep it fair, we had to keep it loud.)]

Layla (LP): Somebody said turn it up! And it was me 🙂

Still unbalanced and not enough resolution on the guitar [note this comparison is with the No. 1, we played Layla while we were getting settled(?)]. Kevin: Heard a lot more. Neli: Duane Allman versus Eric Clapton, can hear different emotion, pain, anguish.

More separation, resolution. More confusing with so much more detail [Kevin and Neli disagreed with me. But this song is all about lots of confusion with a voice and piercing guitar rising above it all. Or so I think, anyway. And my feeling at the time was that more resolution brought the confusion too much into the domain of the voice and guitar.].

* Prime


Jorma Design PRIME

Dylan: Voice much more real. So much more body, many more subtle details. It’s a party! Everybody ‘must get stoned’! The emotion and meaning behind Dylan’s words was not apparent [to me] before. His songs are mostly made up of catch phrases, and sometimes whole sentences, that stand on their own and the music and Dylan’s intonation emphasis this. Kind of like Eva above, his emotion changes a lot during a song – but in this case, he is mostly talking to us – and this works because many people have slightly different emotions about each different thing they talk about during a conversation; and even within a single topic, the intonations will vary.

Trumpets sound great. The harmonics cuts through and rises above it all. So much more information in the voice – you can hear what he is meaning as it changes word to word – and he is having a great time vamping a lot of the time. He is having fun, making fun, poking fun, and speaking to us, not singing to us – which is communicating at a different, more personal level.

Piercing harmonica is almost a parody of being musical – it is slightly comical it is so piercing. This is kind of what harmonicas are meant to do.

Kevin: More trademark nasality in voice.

The change to Prime was like moving from and old CD player to LP: much more real and ‘more of a presentation’, this was like a real show was happening in our room. At this point, for me, it was more fascinating than engaging. It was like hearing Dylan for the first time [the first time I really heard Dylan, that I can remember, was at a party in the University student ghetto in 69. Couldn’t figure out why everybody must have stones thrown at them. I was 11 at the time.]

Kevin: Keeps PRaT. Adds Refinement

Neli: Little more laid back than Origo.

Next song: harmonica has so many inner harmonies. Chucking on the guitar is now apparently fully rendered.


Jorma Design PRIME

Radiohead:

Kevin: More space.

Me: So much more detail around each note

Neli: More nuanced [I gave her a hard time for such a common description. 🙂 She came back with better layering, better density, and fuller bass].

Me: LOTS more ethereal. Sounds a lot more like music than reproduced sound.

Kevin: greater depth of sadness

Me: Violins really apparent and present

Kevin: biggest gap yet between Origo and Prime. [This started some debate as to whether we all agreed on this – or whether No. 1 to Origo was biggest jump in performance. They are both large gaps and, whereas Kevin held his position, I am not so sure].

[My suspicion is that because PRIME handles nuances better, and because Radiohead is nuanced music, that the Prime sounded especially well on Radiohead]

Neli: More organic [Now I REALLY gave her a hard time :-)]

LAYLA:

The voice came over much more as a real voice. Echo in concert hall much more evident. The compression in the bass is more evident as well [this evolved into me going on – no, I had not been drinking, but sometimes I seem to act like it anyway – about how these Cream and Clapton-like anthems are just going to be like this; a mass of sound with people and guitars shouting with all the emotion they can muster, just to be heard. Their trademark understated anthems. Very unpretentious]

Neli: More body to Clapton before Duane came in [I think that is what she said – maybe I HAD been drinking and didn’t know it]

Kevin: Clapton by himself, more emotional and desperate.

Neli or Kevin: Piano tells harmonic story here in its decays.

Me: tweets at end of song have a dimension, they appear in various locations in the soundstage, and they each move off the stage in different directions.

——————————————————–

So at this point, we have ODIN interconnect and PRIME speaker cable. We are liking it. Hey! We say, “Let’s try ODIN speaker cable on the bass units instead of the Valhalla!”

* ODIN on bass towers

Jorma Kaukonen #9 Big River Blues: Bass more prominent. More open, more integration between main towers and bass towers [which we previously didn’t think needed to be any more tightly integrated]. Bass not as tight, but much more natural. Another layer of gauze removed?! Decay in hall better.

Radiohead #7 [on in Rainbows. Why I wrote the tracks down now and not many hours ago, who can tell]. Less compressed. Smoother? More PRaT.

Best I’ve heard this song sound. A nice ease; bass not needing to be turned down.

Dylan: Decay better in drum, and better hall ambiance. Greater ease to the whole thing – less compressed. Bass more part of song – better integrated.

Kevin: Improves menace and lurking feeling.

Me: More ACCESSIBLE detail in harmonica; can now focus right in – mind no longer has to deal with ignoring bass problems. Somewhere during the night, the harmonica became one of my favorite things to listen to in these songs – so many harmonies – so rich.

Kevin: More extension on harmonics. Somewhere in here, Kevin became an advocate for the idea that it was not only bass that was improved, but the entire spectrum of sound. I eventually proposed a hypothesis that the crossover was being affected by the ODIN cables in a positive way, that the blowback from the bass towers was now a more positive influence on the crossover, which affects all frequencies. The other hypothesis, that the bass frequencies being better influences other frequencies at various multiples of their frequencies, is also out there on the table for us to ponder as we switch back to Origo once again, but on the bass towers]

* Origo on the bass units

replacing ODIN, with ODIN upstream interconnect and PRIME on the main towers

More compressed, and less open, not as much separation. More bass texture, rounder, more definition. Music further back in hall.

Neli: Much leaner. Was Valhalla better?

Brain fried from listening to so many things. I personally can’t remember that far back. What we do is put the ODIN speaker cable back on the bass towers. The next day we rearrange several things to put the ODIN power cord on the crossover/bass-amp. This caused another jump in ease and openness and separation. Perhaps not as much as we hoped, but the PC is still in its position because currently that is the most optimum place we know to put it.

——————————

Fini

And that concludes the report of the findings at our shootouts at this time. Thanks go to Rick and Jim, especially Kevin, Dan, and, uh, oh yeah, Neli 🙂

What fun was had by one and all. Have to do another one of these, and soon.

Shootout 1 – Introduction and the Interconnects

In one corner, weighing in at…

This shootout is primarily focused on Jorma Design cables. We compare and contrast their cables with their other cables, at different price points, as well as with the correspondingly priced Nordost cables.

This is another shootout that went on and on and just would not end [kind of like real shootouts – wouldn’t everybody at the OK Corral just hide behind something and fire a round every so often hoping the other people would just go away? Oh, but I digress]

Like I wrote before, this is based on about 16 hours of listening, with several people in attendance much of the time, and about 23 pages of notes [aka scribbles].

Why so long? Why so many notes? Thinking about it, it makes sense if you realize that we compared 6 interconnects against each other and 5 speaker cables against each other.


Upstream: This part of the shootout we used the Audio Note CDT Three transport and Balanced 4.1x DAC, Lamm L2 linestage, 10m Valhalla interconnect, Powered by an Nordost ODIN PC on the DAC, several ELROD PCs, all plugged into a Nordost Thor. Later we used the Brinkmann turntable with Lyra Titan cartridge, Valhalla PC on the Lamm LP2 phono, and the EMM Labs CDSA digital.

We also wanted to pay close attention to the differences, so that once and for all we would know what to expect when we propose inserting one cable for another.

One hopes, when one does these things, at least from a dealers point of view, that the more expensive cables sound better than the lesser prices cables, and that the performances are spread out more or less evenly, and correspond closely with the manner in which the prices are spread out.

Bargains!

And that is what we found [whew!] except that the performance of the Origo 1 meter interconnect [longer lengths increase the price rapidly] kills the competition at the $4K price point, including their own No. 1. It costs only $5200 and therefore represents a significant price/performance bargain.

This is similar to the Audio Note PALLAS 1 meter interconnect at $4500 [for use as a phono or digital cable] – either could go up several $1000 and still be good values. Just a heads up, people.

Interconnects

* Jorma Design No. 1 balanced interconnect.

Our first attempt to hear the No. 1 was on the back of the Audio Note Kegon Balanced. Previously we had the much more expensive single-ended Jorma Design PRIME on the back using a Purist Audio RCA to XLR adapter. What this taught us was that the adapter, previously thought to be only somewhat damaging, was voted off the island. Without the adapter, the sound was more open, relaxed, better macro-separation, better spacing in the sound stage, etc. Not as much resolution, or harmonic color, as the PRIME through the adapter, and in the end the PRIME probably sounded better – but seriously, the adapter is for emergency situations only.

After this particular shootout, we exchanged the Kegon Balanced for the Lamm ML2.1, which handles single-ended RCA and balanced XLR cables more or less with equanimity.

* Nordost Valhalla Balanced interconnect

Dire Straits and Radiohead: The soundstage was a little closer to the listener. More presence in the center position and less presence at the left of center, right of center positions. Neli thought it sounded more open and cleaner. I thought it sounded slightly more compressive. If you figure that our exactly opposite opinions cancel each other out – then you can rightly conclude that these two cables are remarkably similar to each other.

Opera: The singer is always quite distant in this piece, and my notes say 39th row. One might say that Valhalla accentuates the distance of the musicians from the listener, bring them closer or further away. Conversely one could say that the No. 1 dampens or moderates the distance. For my personal taste, I think I could care less either way – so I’m just saying they are different so that you, the reader, are well-informed. Valhalla has a slightly more powerful leading edge, which lends it to sound more substantial and powerful than the No. 1. The tops of the notes are slight muted in comparison to the No. 1.

* Jorma Design No. 1 balanced interconnect.

According to my notes we went back to the No. 1 again. Aren’t we thorough. We probably played things in reverse order, as we zig-zag through our 3 musical selections. The No. 1 seemed lighter-on-its-feet. Neli: better harmonics. Being a little quicker, and at the same time a little lighter presentation, gave the voice better articulation, more emotion and there seemed to be better separation. Neli: more veiled [maybe but I’ll lend her a couple of q-tips anyway].

The conclusion here, I think, is that in the spectrum of cables going from powerful sounding, like the Acoustic Zen and Audio Note [and other reasonable cables out there] to the lighter sounding like the Stealth INDRA, these 2 cables are close together, but the Valhalla being on the more powerful sounding side of the fence and the No. 1 of the more deft side of the fence. Note that the PRIME and ODIN have left the planet and are not on either side of the fence.


The Prime and Origo interconnects

* Jorma Design Origo

Funny ears are. We sat and listened to this on several cuts, as you will read below. It was easy to convince ourselves that the PRIME couldn’t be better than this. Listen to all that resolution, that even-handedness, that emotion. Uh, oh, Jorma Design has made this cable too good and nobody is going to like the PRIME anymore.

Of course, Neli and I had our suspicions that the PRIME might just be better than people thought – but how MUCH better was and is really hard to guess unless you do a shootout like this and compare them back and forth [or you live for one for a while and then do the switch insitu].

As it turned out, the PRIME killed the Origo in several different categories – but this just goes to show that 1) a person can be happy with any properly performing cable [not that there are many properly performing cables out there], and 2) unless you already have the very best cables, and even though you are more or less happy with what you currently use, an upgrade will make your system sound worlds better than it did before.

Anyway. I wrote only 2 words for the first 5 to 10 minutes of listening. Fuller Resolution.

I have been noticing lately how the better cables seem to fill in the music, making lesser cables seem weak and anemic and a sketch of the musicians instead of real-solid people.

Some of this has to do with resolution, obviously, but it is like looking down on a mountain range, and seeing only the peaks, versus seeing the valleys and the trees as well as the peaks. With lesser cables, the main players are on the stage, you can hear them, point to them, describe how far away they are, etc. With better cables, you can see the guitar, and stage, the auditorium… all the spaces in between are filled in.

Similarly, I think we could also think of it as only hearing the peaks of each note with lesser cables, compared to hearing much more of the lead-in and decay with better cables. Everything is filled in better.

Radiohead (House of Cards – what a weird song, they try and make the system sound broken by putting lots of sounds of things rattling around in the mix)

[Compared to the No. 1] More resolution. More full. Soundstage more filled in. Less cloudy. More sibilance [see below ***].

Kevin: More ghostly voice.

At this point, the Origo was so much better than the No. 1, there wasn’t too much need to describe it further – and with the change to the system [detailed below] kind of invalidating backward comparisons anyway, we are really setting the stage here for comparisons to our next cables: the PRIME, ODIN and INDRA.

Chinese Female Vocal: More separation, More midi-dynamics. Kevin: More subtle intonations in voice.

Eva Cassidy (Tall trees, Georgia) More immediate, veil lifted, more real – here in the room. Kevin: More hall ambiance.

* PRIME

Rachmaninov(?): Smoother. Better flow, better subtler texture. Not as rough. Kevin: more forceful, better start and stop. Neli: Better separation. Neli and Jim: More emotional. Neli: properly highlights soloist.

Chinese Female Vocal: More space. Subtle changes in loudness are more apparent, like when she performs a vibrato. Kevin: richer [I agree]. More intensity in midrange.

Radiohead: Neli: Better PRaT. Kevin: Juicier. Me: More subtle clues that this is a real voice.

* Stealth INDRA


The INDRA

Edgier, Grittier. Good tone. Some sibilance. Less controlled and muddier than Origo. Good separation. Some clustering around Left, Center and Right. Kevin: More forward voice. Neli: Good delicacy in the highs [yes].
[*** We switched power cords on the Marten Coltrane Supreme crossover/bass-amp box to the more expensive Acrolink from Valhalla, which cleared up most of the sibilance. We hardly ever get sibilance, and it was with surprise that 1) we had sibilance all of a sudden in the first place [although usually the crossover is on an HRS platform, which probably usually helps some to prevent this from happening in the first place :-)], 2) that this change in power cord such a large effect on something we thought pretty much sounded the way it sounded and nothing was really going to affect it much. We now have an ODIN power cord on the crossover/bass-tower-amps box. Oooo-la-la it is good].

With this change to the system [detailed above] kind of invalidating backward comparisons anyway, we are really setting the stage here for more intense comparisons of the cables: the PRIME, ODIN and ORIGO.

* ORIGO


Origo and Prime

Many good things. Less separation in the highs, less focus on the highs than the INDRA [the INDRA is really good at this – very light on its feet in the upper registers – which makes it not so good as a tonearm or digital cable, but great everywhere else]. The Origo is more of a whole. More body.

* ODIN


The Odin interconnect on the Lamm ML2.1 amplifier

Classical: Better balance between instruments. More dynamics. The violin is much more realistic.

Chinese Female Vocal: The voice is very 3D. The decay of the notes on the cello is amazing.

Eva Cassidy: Can hear the interaction between Eva and the microphone. Lots of subtle clues here make it seem like you are there. The dynamics are very real – a little abrupt like the mic is being overloaded slightly – very real.

* PRIME

Eva: To me the Prime harmonics has a slightly orange color. The ODIN is white with a tinnnnnnnny bit of blue. More focus on the midrange than the ODIN. Less hall ambiance. Less “light” on the presentation – more laid back. Jim: better highs [which the rest of us disagreed with – the PRIME is slightly rolled off compared to the ODIN – but I put this here because he heard something in the highs he liked better than with the ODIN]. Kevin: more exuberance.

AKFest 2009 – May 2 and 3

The Audio Karma Fest [hard not to type Kharma] is right around the corner, time wise, and right outside Detroit Michigan, hotel wise.

Audio Note U.K. will be showing our Zero level line of separate components. When we fired them up, right out of the box, cold, new, in front of doubting ears [ours], it was immediately obvious that they sounded better than 90% of the rooms at shows that I have heard – and that they sounded like a system. Very well-balanced.


As you can see, they are fashionably small, but not small enough to fit side by side on the Acoustic Dreams’ rack shelves. Almost, though.

A full report later – but hopefully many of you will be in Detroit next weekend and get to hear it for yourselves.

There are four pieces, a transport, a integrated amp, a DAC and a Phono preamplifier.


DAC 0.1X ‘Valve Output Stage’ with USB input


R Zero/II ‘Valve Phono Stage’


I Zero ‘Valve Integrated Amplifier’


CDT Zero/II ‘CD Transport’

A Very Popular Iranian Hi-Fi Blog

There is a very popular Iranian Hi-Fi Blog. I’ve been watching it for awhile, actually, as they link to us and they quote things off the blog and website occasionally. It’s mostly in Farsi, so its not like I get a whole lot out of my visits.

Amir, who runs the blog, emailed me about Romy’s DPOLS speaker setup observations, and I wrote back, and think you all might be interested in both my response and others, which he has posted on his blog here:

Iran Hi-Fi Blog

I kept writing DPOL, by which I meant Dead Points Of Live Sound *Point* but the my abbreviation wasn’t really thought through. I could have used ‘DP’ but that acronym has other meanings and Dead Point does not seem to be very flattering for such a wonderful speaker location. Maybe OP for Optimal Point might be better.

OK, here is the transcript:

“Yeah, I think Romy has something here. It makes sense anyway. Romy posted this a long time ago, and we’ve had some time to mull over the idea.

Some of the issues I see:

* It gets more confusing when there are multiple people with multiple tastes involved. Some prefer a fuller sound on the bottom so that the overall freq response is flat [more like live music] – some prefer the best possible transparency, etc.

* It is very easy to keep moving the speaker so that it appears to get better and better with each move – yet overall the sound gets worse. I’ve seen this with hardware modders too. I think this has to do with each move improving one area of the sound inadvertently at the expense of another

* It is very easy to just give up after finding a local maxima [using simulated annealing as a model of speaker position optimization]. I.E. you find the best spot within a particular inch or two and particular orientation and you just want to sit down and listen to some music 🙂

* The dpol changes if you change the amp, cd player, cables, power cords, etc. and probably when there are more people in the room. Some of these changes are minor – but dpol is all about minor changes having large impacts…

Anyway, as a store we change things all the time – and so DPOL is hard to maintain over time. We more or less just try to minimize any negative interactions with the room and be happy with that – though this is another approach to speaker placement in and of itself and it has paid off big time once in a while.

One thing I have not seen addressed is how to mark the position of speakers accurately. Tape on the floor is really horribly unhelpful when we start talking about positions more highly resolving than half an inch or so, and about, oh, 5 – 10 degrees of arc or so.

Happy to hear you all are getting good results. Have these results given you a deeper perspective on this subject that you would like to share?

Thanks,
Mike.

جالبه بدونید نظر آقای آرتور سالواتوره رو هم جویا شدم:

Dear Amir,
I’ve never met Romy, but we have communicated in the past, we have links to each other and I visit his website once a month or so.
I’m not sure about DPOLS, because I have never experienced a situation where 1/16 or 1/32 of an inch made such a huge difference, as described in the short essay, and I’ve heard many thousands of setups.
I obviously realize the critical importance of speaker positioning and room acoustics, and I have spent months, and sometimes even years, optimizing just one set-up (my own system of course), but not to the degree of an ultra tiny movement that I can not even see with my eyes or measure (for repeatability).
Sadly, most audiophiles are not even in “the optimum zone”, let alone the one perfect spot, and that should be addressed first before moving on to a goal which may not be feasible for most.
Best Regards,
Arthur Salvatore
www.high-endaudio.com”

24 Pages of Notes on about 15 Hours of Shootouts

These shootouts focused on primarily Jorma Design interconnects and speaker cables, [the No.3, No.1, Origo and PRIME but not the No.2], and Nordost ODIN interconnect and speaker cable kept appearing [largely because everyone was curious and as a kind of reference standard] and INDRA was thrown in once in awhile.

The Audio Note PALLAS was not part of the shootouts – it has kind of been relegated to the ‘ridiculously excellent price/performance digital/phono cable’ category [a category it now dominates]. Perhaps we are mistaken to relegate it so. We need to try and throw it in as a regular interconnect sometime.

None of the other Audio Note orNordost cables were shot at because, well, this was really about evaluating the Jorma No. 3 and Origo and we needed to focus on something … otherwise we’d be here all year doing the shootouts [awwwwww :-)].

A quick summary:

Origo [or-eh-go] means origin in Swedish. At about $5200 or so the first meter the interconnect kills things at the $4K level. It is not the PRIME [at $10K] – but it has lots of resolution and is very open and clean.

The No.3 [their least expensive cable] is very much a cable that sounds like its more precious siblings – just somewhat leaner and with less resolution, and with less presence and image specificity – but the tone is still spot on [just not as rich] and it is quite clear sounding with above average separation.

Using ODIN interconnect to go from the Marten Coltrane Supreme speaker crossover to the amps [Lamm ML2.1 in this case], and Jorma PRIME speaker cable on the main towers and Nordost ODIN(!) on the bass towers is now our favorite setup.

The full shootout report will be forthcoming…