Pursuing the Ultimate Music Experiences

Audio Federation High-Fidelity Audio Blog

Show News…

As you all may remember, the Rocky Mountain Audiofest is coming right up on the 14th, 15th and 16th of October:

RMAF

T.H.E. Show also just put out a newsletter:

The Show Las Vegas mostly about the Newport Show and lots of rumors [but Home Theater? I personally enjoy home theater but I think the bubble has burst on that front. Try something like ‘Tablet-driven Audio/Video systems’ and we might actually get some ordinary people to these shows]

We will have a 100% Audio Note room at RMAF and maybe even two of them 🙂

Seeing some of the promotional material for these shows… *sigh*. It’s not getting any more honest and ethical out there, is it?

Most of the rags give out several hundred variations on an ‘Award’ each year – pretty much to everything they review or want to review or see or have heard of. And then the more desperate? clueless? market-savvy??? manufacturers display these awards as if they meant something real.

Maybe our next magazine should be called “Serious F*cking Audio”? Or maybe “Not Your Average Pandering Crap High-end Audio”? [Nah. Too long :-)].

There is a reason the ‘Academy Awards’ (Oscars) have some significance in the motion picture industry [besides affecting consumer buying behavior]. They don’t give out 100 Best Actor awards and 50 Best Picture awards. 🙂

The end of the world as we all have known it

I am going to make a prediction here…

Most of my predictions are pretty good, but my timing is usually way, WAY off. Just sayin’.

I predict that most of the music and movies we have known will sometime in the not-to-distant future be… persona-non-Grata. Unwelcome to the average listener.

The logic goes like this. Many of you may know that Netflix had to raise their prices by 60% yesterday. Why? Because the Recording Industry is charging them much more than a year ago. Think: 10 times as much.

But we can all watch YouTube for free [maybe a commercial].

The idea is that there will be a time when there are so many bands and movie makers making content for free – AND that they will be so easy to find – that listening to someone LIKE Miles Davis for free will beat paying $100/month to corporations that sue little old ladies for downloading music and blind guys for downloading porn.

I think artists will make money not by selling content but by selling tickets to shows – and other methods by which they work with the music/movie lover instead of suing them. What a concept huh? 😉

I think this could happen at any time – but is most likely in the next 5 to 10 years.

Before that we will probably see micro-payments where you pay a few cents per minute and can listen/see anything you want [Do you realize that at $1/song itunes is – if each song is 3 minutes long, they make $20/hour off of someone who is just exploring new music? -This is where.how we have always been kind of ripped off. Buying an album, hoping it will be good because you heard of one of the artists before or because of the cool cover…. been there, done that 1000s of times. Gets expensive and is usually unsatisfactory.]

Selecting what to play: the pain. The Pain.

I overheard the Pandora CEO justifying their market cap now that they are a publicly traded company and he said something that was very interesting to me.

Something to the effect that 60-80% of the time people do NOT want to choose what music they want to listen to, but have it chosen for them. Now, for the dominant internet radio website, it makes sense that they would say something like this. But is it true? And for however true it is, what does it mean for audiophiles?

Audiophiles who have nothing of audiophile quality that plays music for us [excluding friends and significant others].

Yeah, there are some nice tuners and some music servers out there – but hardly what one would call audiophile-quality.

Like, you know, why can’t a $100K turntable come with a mechanism – totally detached from but designed to work with the table – that randomly selects albums and plays them for us? Or a CD carousel player with a similar quality profile?

Anyway, I do think that it is a pain to pick out music to play all the time and I can understand why people accept a degradation in sonic performance in order to have someone else do it for them. Not sure any of this justifies Pandora’s stock price – but that is not going to bother me late at night.

[I know. Not many posts lately. The system sounded great and I stayed away from the paper and online rags But that only lasted so long… ;-). There is a lot more to talk about… in future posts here.]

HiFi Vision – Your free Hifi magazine for iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch

[We received this email yesterday… Thought it might be of interest. Curious how many audiophiles read audio porn on the Apple i-things, but …well… some might.]

We are a team of HiFi addicted journalists and have released a new,
interactive HiFi and consumer electronics magazine.

It will be published weekly and can be downloaded for free, using the
HiFi-Vision App.

The international consumer electronic magazine focuses on HiFi, TV, Home Cinema and High End. You can choose either the German or
English issue. As the App store offers both versions, HiFi Vision serves both the national German as well as the international CE market.

HiFi Vision provides you with reviews, product tests, news, workshops
and many more hifi-related topics.

The app supports smooth scrolling and comes with an amazing “Push
Notification” functionality that reminds you if a new issue is published.

Stay tuned and download your HiFi Vision Magazine now at
www.hifivision.net or directly at

http://itunes.apple.com/en/app/hifi-vision/id424509961

Daniel Muer / HiFi Vision Team

—————

Facebook: “HiFi Vision EN”
Twitter: “hifivision_en”
E-Mail: info(at)hifivision.net
Internet: www.hifivision.net

A funny thing happened…

This was a month or so ago…

As often happens, it was around 2 or 3am and we were asleep.

I then woke up out of a sound sleep because my overlarge but quite efficient nose had detected an unusually strong smell in the air.

The small of way WAY too hot electronics. That is what it smelled like anyway.

As it so happened, I woke Neli in my somewhat panicky attempt to get out of bed and see what was happening. The smoke alarms were not going off so that seemed like a good sign [but who trusts those things anyway? They mostly go off because their battery got a little low – who knows if they actually work].

We discussed our guest who was sleeping, presumably soundly, downstairs and I was nominated to pound on their door and rouse them if that became necessary – as I was male and so were they [still are to the best of my knowledge].

And here is the thing – we had turned on all the audio gear in two systems – and some of which was not hooked up but on stand-by. So we cannot but think that something is seriously overheating and in danger of a melt down. Right? So we go sniffing this and sniffing that. The Ongaku amp? Nice clean warm comfy-on-a-cold-morning air coming off of that. The Meitner ? Nice new yummy electronics small was coming off of that.

I mean, we are sticking our noses in the most unusual places, behind racks, under benches. Making all these sniff sniff sniffing noises. And we were kind of in a hurry. This was a VERY strong smell.

But nothing smelled bad. We went downstairs. The equipment there was also fine.

Was it the furnace? Sniff the air coming out of the ducts. Nope.

So then we went room to room, just to see if we could smell where it was the strongest. Kind of strong in my office – but *sniff* *sniff* *sniff* my monitor and computer were fine.

Then I thought to start turning on the lights to see what we could see. I went to look in the bathroom, to turn on the light there, and it wouldn’t come on. Then I remembered I had turned it on as a sort of ‘night light’ for our guest should he want to come up stairs to the kitchen for a snack.

But the light was not on and wouldn’t go on.

Then I turned on the secondary lights, the shower lights, to see what the heck was happening here, not thinking it was related.

But lo and behold, the light had blown out, and apparently had caught fire, causing a big stink but luckily not burning the house down. The was a Sunbeam florescent bulb from 2002.

Well that was that. We turned off the power to the thing, made sure it was dormant, and then went back to bed.

Shame on us for thinking at first that it was the audio equipment! Bad us! Could of just as well been an old TV or computer or whatever.

Certainly would never think it was a light bulb. Kind of scarey to think about. It was an older bulb, and I am sure the technology has advanced quite a bit since those early days of screw-in florescent replacements for incandescent bulbs.

I’ll post a photo later. If I do that now, then people will know what the culprit was just by scanning the blog without having to first follow along as Mike Cheech and Neli Chong went sniffing at the most unlikely things that night.

Comcast

OK. This is kind of … well… I want to say bad things about Comcast, especially the move to digital cable TV. What this ultimately means for high-end audio is unclear, the rush of people abandoning TV for internet video will probably be good for computer audio – since people will be used to using a computer for ‘living-room type entertainment’ and bad for old-style components-in-the-livingroom setups. But do not know for sure. Obviously.

Anyway, the move to digital cable from analog has been disastrous. I have some programs still recorded on a TiVo from the analog cable days, and here are the differences:

* The audio is both brighter and more muffled at the same time. Words are MUCH harder to understand now. When the sound gets a little too loud then it is hard, edgy and harsh.

* Roughly half of the picture is chopped off (all the sides have been cropped off about 25%)

* Blacks and grays are now black (many darkish movies are now unwatchable)

* changing channels now takes about 5 to 10 seconds (presumably it is sending a signal over the internet for each button push, and they are very slow at responding, unlike Google search which responds immediately each letter you type. for example)

* As people migrate away from TV, the quality of the programming has declined to primarily appeal to the types of people who do not feel comfortable on the internet.

—————————–

Like most people, we have no choice but to use Comcast. We used to have a small cable company for Boulder County, Jones Intercable, but Comcast bought them out. What happens is that companies here in the U.S. can buy out a small competitor, take over their customer base, lower services and raise prices for those customers, and then use the resulting profits [and promise of future profits] to leverage and buy out yet another small competitor, repeating the process over and over until there are no small competitors left.

I do not really bemoan the end of TV, as such – but to have it end this way is kind of sad. I understand Google TV will offer internet video (YouTube, Vimeo, Dailymotion, etc) in a large screen format in our living-rooms, which is great but I do not see that having a high-end sound system hooked up to your video system is going to be of much benefit [it definitely WAS for analog cable, which I heartily enjoyed for 25 years; with digital cable it has been hit and miss… the source quality being so bad. Now with internet video… it isn’t as bad as digital cable, but it ain’t ‘CD quality’ which all of a sudden we are looking *UP* to… ? *sigh*].

How do our listening perceptions change?

Did that component just start sounding better? That component I thought sucked a few years ago now sounds great. Are they building them better now?

Or conversely, did that component just start sounding terrible? Are they just building that component that I used to think was great, and now I think sucks, with worse parts than they used to?

Or is it just me?

We all run into these circumstances where our impressions of sound quality change. Some changes in our perceptions occur over years. Some over days. Some take just a few minutes 🙂

Oh, and the answers to the introductory questions are… yes.

There are all sorts of reasoning we use to describe such a topsy-turvy apparently wishy-washy situation…

1. The quality of the power changes in direct relation to the quality of the changes in the sound [I have always been suspicious of this one, and instead prefer #2]

2. Our emotional state affects how we enjoy most kinds of music – it taking perhaps an hour or so to relax and enjoy many kinds of more ‘laid back’ music genres if it has been a hectic day

3. If we do not have a lot of experience listening to different equipment, first impressions – which may last weeks – are just not reliable, and long term impressions are only relevant compared to what we had previously

4. Our ears do change and grow more experienced and we are able to hear more – we educate our ears just like wine lovers educate their palette [this reasoning is often used in a derogatory manner by non-audiophiles to explain why THEY can’t hear, or taste, something.]

5. Manufacturers do actually change equipment without telling everybody, usually for the better

6. Our preferences change. [This is the most interesting subject, for me personally]. As we hear better and better equipment for long periods of time, as our ears grow to trust that we are not going to attack them with aggressive and annoyingly obnoxious exaggerations or parodies of sound – we start to hear things… the mind – ear interface becomes more and more efficient, and we start experiencing other states of mind more and more often.

It is not just drug-like sound that many of us are looking for, but the ability for the drug-like sound to affect us deeply. This is opposite to a typical addiction where one becomes less and less sensitive to a drug. Here, as we open ourselves to the music more and more frequently, and achieve a drug-like ‘high’ from the music more often, the more easy it becomes. [This is why it is a good thing that the faster I drive, the louder the wind noise, and the less able I am able to hear the car radio .. :-)]

This increased sensitivity to drug-like sounds, and this, what we have been calling the drug-like music state, if pursued with some diligence over time, is a great thing. It is independent of the cost of the system making the drug-like sound. Expensive systems can deliver a more powerful druggish sound, and more frequently [ sometimes every time you play them! Danger Will Robinson! ], but otherwise it is an experience that is available to just about everybody who cares to try and achieve this musically altered state-of-mind.

Dealership versus Distributorship

As we look at expanding Audio Federation’s footprint, we often think about whether to expand the distributorship side of the business or to expand the dealership side of the business. When we talk to people about this, everyone sure does seem to have figured it all out 🙂 but it is all in great fun and full of good-willed optimism and I thought I would try and share some of that here.

There are several goals here – financial, of course. And stability. Building the Audio Federation ‘Brand’. And also just the day-to-day, which is the most fun versus being somewhat boring or a royal pain-in-the-butt. Oh yeah, and which are we better at?

Essentially,: Which will we be more successful at, both in terms of earnings and personal enjoyment – an expanded dealership or an expanded import business?

First – being a dealer is WAY more fun. We get to meet a lot of nice people, play a lot of music, get to hear a lot of new music. I mean, in some sense, this is the ultimate can’t-really-be-a-job-can-it job. And Neli is really, really good at the customer interface thing – she is always so patient and understanding and helpful. But on the practical side [ick. HATE that side :-)] one has to look at the rise of the internet and the used gear racket and the decreasing loyalty people feel towards their dealers [less so for older folk, but still, it ain’t like the olden days]. Stability wise, I think dealers are able to hang onto a product line longer than distributors, on average [and as distributors, this is a perception we will have to fight all the time – we want to be the distributors for something, once we decide to take it on – for, like, forever].

Anyway, on the ‘this is fun and something we really want to do’ side of the equation, expanding the dealership wins [and we have some rather unique ideas, we think, to make it a heckuva lot more fun – for everybody – once we get down out of the mtns].

On the other hand – some people feel that being a distributor is the only way to be a success in this business [Actually, being a cable manufacturer has a much higher probability of financial success, but I digress…]. But, as one looks at successful distributors versus dealers, what does one see? Well, I do not know what people see, and there is not much actual data here that I am 100% sure of – but I see Sumiko on one hand, apparently successful importer [judging by by the number of their reps and success of the brands they carry, along with the premium they charge for importation] and I see Listen Up, apparently successful Colorado dealer [based on the number of their stores and large advertising budget -they also have strong pro and Home Theater arms of the business ].

So, I am not sure distributors do any better than dealers do in achieving financial success. Opening a recreational goods store would be a much better idea – in Money mag or somewhere they report that this is a quickly growing area of the economy and the average store makes about $500K in revenue [we do not do so bad here -thanks everybody! – but the average dealership makes way less than this].

OK. the $64M question: Is being a distributor any fun? No. It really ain’t. But it does have its satisfactions: Neli loves talking with and helping dealers a lot. We like helping products get into the U.S. and becoming more and more successful. We get a hand in helping way more audiophiles get their hands on high quality gear – albeit indirectly – and this is very rewarding [although we are very honored to be dealers for all of our lines, being the Audio Note importer/distributor is ultimately more rewarding, as the dealer network magnifies the impact of our efforts to get people to replace the Bad Sounding with the Good Sounding].

So where does that leave us?

Yes, we are going to expand.

Yes, we are going to move the store somewhere more appropriate [not sure when, but there are few places less appropriate than here in the foothills above Boulder].

Yes, we want to expand our showrooms [It’s where the most fun is. We had 4 large systems setup here before we decided to move – which is more than most large dealers. We would like to bump this up a notch or 2… and this time get a place with corners so we can also show off the Audio Note speakers to their best effect :-)].

Yes, we are going to have a magazine once again. Although Spintricity is currently mothballed, we will revisit this magazine idea…

Yes, we are going to… 🙂

[OK. Hope this non-audiophile business-centric post was not too darn boring. But it is a topic that has been on our minds a lot lately – and just thought I’d give you a peek behind the scenes here a little].

The Important of Appearance

I was reading this paper on how attractive websites do better with users than usable websites:

Visual Appeal vs. Usability

Well, that article refers to an extreme example, but this is something that has been difficult for me to comes to terms with, geek that I am, but it is really hard to overestimate the value of appearance when an average person makes a decision about something.

From presidents to cars to websites and … yes… to high end audio gear.

I would say the list of important criteria looks something like:

price – what is this going to cost me relative to the other choices?
convenience – how much work must I do for one choice versus another?
appearance – how attractive is one versus the others

competency – how well does one perform relative to the others.

——————————–

With this list I think one can explain why MS Windows beat out Apple, why the ipod and iphone beat out their competitors, why Facebook beat out WAY better designed competitors… and why some products in our industry actually sell a few units, no matter how competent they are vis-a-vis their competition – and why some others don’t do as well.

I don’t really have any specific products in mind. We can all think of wonderful looking amps and racks and speakers that seem to be doing OK in this over-crowded marketplace – and perhaps their very attractiveness is the reason why.

I do think it is something ALL manufacturers here should pay attention to – though I feel few actually do. They feel as I do, of course, that competent products should rise to the top.