Why we now only talk about the sound of our favorite rooms at shows

When we started these show reports, there was only Stereophile’s printed show reports, which came out months later, and which said little to nothing about the sound.

We knew enough by then to be able to describe things as sounding ‘bright’ or ‘dull’, whether they had good or bad imaging, … the basics. We felt this was useful to people.

Soon thereafter, forum personalities and online magazines would post their opinions. Room X ‘blew the other rooms away’.

Largely as a reaction to these people, we would post reports that would say something about that same room like ‘This was really great… if you like extremely bright and thin sound’.

We tried to counter these dubiously arrived at opinions that people shouted on the net with facts.

Now there are maybe a thousand more voices out there. Still very few facts about the sound, just lots of opinions.

The vast majority of people cannot tell the difference between fact and opinion [facts give you information upon which to base your own decisions about what you like or not, opinions are just someone else’s conclusions, based on wishful thinking usually (though sometimes deceptively wrapped in fact-like terminology)].

However, there is a better way. If you want to hear what a room sounded like, go to YouTube and watch Peter and Terry’s AVShowRoom video of the room. You can learn a lot about what the room sounded like without having to wade through opinions of people who own systems that, if you heard them, would probably make you switch hobbies…

For example, this is a video of a room at RMAF 2015 (which we missed, me out sick. first one we missed, ever). Not my favorite classical music, but extremely complex and you can tell that the system is very clean sounding, dynamic and agile… great separation… well you get the idea (it is also reasonably priced which helps us like PranaFidelity’s stuff quite a bit).

Back to our show reports. We will still take photos of everything and still talk about our favorite rooms; why they are our faves and how they did or did not meet our expectations… fun for us and fun, hopefully, for some of you as well 🙂

 

MediaTemple problems

This is not so much an audio post and more a post giving a ‘heads up’ to people wanting to host their blog, a blog with lots of photos anyway, on MediaTemple.

A year ago, about 4 or 5 days after RMAF as the traffic to the show report was at its highest, the host for our website (MediaTemple) started generating (503 service unavailable) errors.

This went on for about 2 months, me thinking they were going to fix their site and they swinging from clueless to blaming it on us.

At some point I finally decided to track the performance of our site on their system using pingdom.com

 

SCXMA6~R

 

You can see how we might every so often be deluded into thinking they had fixed things.

On December 15th or so we moved to Linode. A little more technical work on my part, but twice as fast [about 0.3ms response time], cheaper and it only goes down a few minutes every few months for security updates [or when I muck something up real bad :-)].

The fact that this started happening when we were serving on the order of 10GB of photos/day during a show report is, one might think, interesting. Were we ‘tagged’ as using too much bandwidth [supposedly we had *unlimited* bandwidth there] and this is there way of getting us to leave? Same thing happened to us, on Lunarpages, where we were also kind of invited to leave because of the growth in our website [by shutting our site down for a few days for using too much CPU. We were there for 10 years and it was great while it lasted] .  Neither place offered us an upgrade path. Probably just trying to go for the low hanging fruit websites that just get a few visitors per month and out of laziness try and get the rest of us to go somewhere else.

Anyway, audiofederation.com has been here almost a year now – so far so good!