Dirty, Nasty, Filthy

… Used LP’s of course…

While making a post about the patterns in the grooves of certain genre LPs, and taking photos to illustrate same, I detected that some of the photos indicated a state of filth that was kind of disturbing.


Now, mind you, these are $1 – $2 records that I bought just to see…, well, you know, it was one of those exploratory missions where we seek to explore strange new music – which only works if one is wealthy or the per cost is kind of very, very low.

Some of these photos make the grooves look very digital don’t they? You can just see the dots and dashes, the 0’s and 1’s, in this view. Well, this IS techno music, so it makes sense, no?

And what is with that semi-circular pattern? It is not visible in the other photos. Did someone set a cup down on this at some time in the past? Are there messages in these grooves that perhaps even the musicians are unaware of? Not sonic messages, but visual – like Carl Sagan’s Cosmos book, where near the zillionth digit of Pi pictures of circles and stuff can be found?.

Nahhhhh.


so those of you without cleaning machines – this is what your cartridge has to dodge and bump over while trying to play the LP for you.


Yes, we need to show the AFTER photos after a cleaning or two. But I think the machine is going to be packed up for the trip to Las Vegas and so there might be a wait – until after the show, and subsequent show reportage.


As you can / will see in the companion post, in many other photos of these albums they look just fine and dandy – they look perfectly playable.


By the way, these two LPs HAVE been brushed off with a standard carbon fiber brush.

Audio Note at CES at Alexis Park

[Neli is helping me here with this post. Hope it gets done this year… well, we have 6 hours, should be enough?]

We have two rooms again this year. One has a modest system and one… does not.

The Modest, Down-to-Earth System

AN/E SPe HE speakers (98dB High efficiency with the hemp drivers – the ones that were brand new at CES last year, now much more broken in)
Oto Phone SE integrated amplifier
CD 2.1x/II CD player
TT2 turntable with ARM Three arm and S4 stepup transformer IO1 cartridge
AN/Vx interconnects, Lexus XL speaker cable

The Over The Top System

AN/E SEC Signature loudspeakers in Madrone with external crossovers – high efficiency with the new tweeters. [uh. brand spanking new. Well, we have the weekend to break them in, Whoo Hoo.]
Kegon Balanced [Brand spanking new. Detecting a pattern here?]
M9 Phono preamplifier [graciously on loan]
DAC 4.1x Balanced DAC
CDT-Three transport
TT3 Reference turntable with AN1S arm, IO Gold cartridge and AN-S9 step-up transformer.
SOTTO interconnects and the new SOGON [50] interconnects and speaker [96] cables
HRS (Harmonic Resolution Systems) SXR 3-shelf equipment rack and 8 M3 Isolation Bases [i.e. 5 on the floor as they say]

The State of the Audio Onion

Yes. Onion.

Let’s see, Romy is blasting Lamm and the new ML3 amp’s propoglicity – but at the same time saying that they are the only ones worthy of being blasted.

6moons has become THE news outlet for audio news, although the reviews and advertising on their site could be considered minimal [even though the site is more popular than ever according to online metric gathering software sites – so why people are not advertising there, I couldn’t tell you. Advertisers, search for 6 moons on Alexa, or A9.com if you prefer. No, not a perfectly reliable metric – but better than guessing with the eyes firmly closed].

The latest HiFi+ spends several pages talking about the RMAF 2007 show, or rather, about *their* room at the show. But, silly me, I didn’t even know they had a room. Anyway, maybe show coverage is only going to be provided by their Absolute Sound brethren.

Stereophile… does this issue seem kind of boring to anyone else? [No, I don’t think ALL of the issues are boring… though thinking back on it….]. For example, the Gear of the Year [nice phraseology there] – Chord and Ayre, digital and amp respectively, OK. Good workhorse equipment. But the Linn LP12? Watt Puppy #8254? Dynaudio Confidence C4? ARC/Cary multichannels?

Not a banner year. [Yes, yes, they CAN all be made to sound good, and most will work tomorrow as well as today, but did the reviewers spend the time to try different amps and cables for the, uh, very particular demands of these speakers, which almost always sound Poopify at shows? No. It was just a year of not much exciting happening over at Stereophile this year. I mean LOOK at the runner ups… EEEEeeeewwwww – though I am surprised they chose the Watt Puppy over the Sophia mk.2, especially given all their attempts to go slumming this last year (did I say that? I guess I did. Funny, when Apple made the computer ‘for the rest of us’ they made it more expensive than the ‘computer for most of us’)]