This is the first time we got to hear the new
Lamm ML3 signature two-box amplifiers. I heard them for awhile on
Monday afternoon, when this picture was taken, and then again for
a longer period on Thursday afternoon. Most of the associated
equipment will contribute a softness to the sound, and the Wilson
speakers a forwardness in the midrange and a disconnected bass.
So, after listening to this and that unfamiliar tune [with
which I heard no problems except a certain reticence at the
crossover point between the midrange and the bass] I was still
unable to characterize much about what was happening, sonically,
in this system]. Vladimir and Elina were kind enough to put on
their Johnny Hartman (with John Coltrane) CD that I was intimately
familiar with.
Using the Lamm ML2.1 as a baseline, ....
I was expecting superb control of the dynamics, that the amp
would be able to grip the speaker well - like the best amps we
have heard - and it did indeed do so, though not conspicuously.
I was expecting superb separation between notes, that the amp
would be able to control each note's dynamic envelope well-enough
that they did not come out in some kind of soup, and again, the
ML3 did not disappoint, and was probably among the best I have
heard in this regard. As one can well extrapolate, good separation
involves not only disambiguating each note with respect to its
location in the soundstage, but dynamically and harmonically as
well.
So, OK, the amp performed as one would expect from one of the
couple of amps that are the best in the world.
What I didn't expect, and which I was so pleased I got to hear
on my very limited time with these amps, was the really
exceptional control of the harmonic envelope. This is going to be
hard to describe [and even harder for you to read :-)] but I
visualized it as each note's dynamic envelope along with its
Harmonics as a 3D 'hill'. Some taller, some shorter, some with
dips and some not. All kinds of shapes. The line bisecting the
hill is the traditional dynamic envelope. Now, imagine harmonics
as horizontal colored stripes that create the sides of the hill,
like elevation lines, but which are different widths and which can
go up and down to other elevations [rise and decay of the
HARMONIC].
Using this imagery, the ML3 was able to keep the harmonic
stripes from decaying or washing out - it was able to paint them
all as they were supposed to be painted. It controlled the
harmonics in a way that gave the notes another dimension. A
solidity in the 'harmonic domain'.
If nothing else, this CD, including the first track I heard, is
very, very harmonically rich. So, during the 4 minutes or so of
the song, there was a lot of harmonic information being delivered
through the system and it was a real pleasure to hear all the
shades of these harmonics, and start to have confidence in the
fact that they were not going to be exaggerated nor marginalized.
The bass was detailed and controlled, though this song does not
have a wealth of material in the lower octaves, and was about as
good as I remember ever hearing it [I usually, however, pay most
attention to the voice and melody and their exceptional emotional
content].
In general though, this system did not highlight the things it
did exceptionally well. In my estimation, that is because much of
the associated equipment was somewhat obscuring what the amps were
doing [Specifically, the speakers mess up the bass integration and
their overall balance is perverted with a tipped up midrange, the
platforms and rack dampen micro-dynamics, which is great for
systems (especially show systems) that have a tendency to be
bright, but this ain't that] In general, we have found that Super
Components, like the ML3, will perform amazingly well with
whatever you pair it with, but that every time you do an upgrade
of something else in the system - you will find out that the Super
Component was a heckuva lot better than you had even imagined it
could be [kind of like getting two upgrades for the price of one].
System design 'just' becomes a matter of feeding the highest
quality signal possible to the Super Component(s).
As I have to say each report, it takes only seconds to hear the
faults in a bad system, and years to hear the faults in a great
one. I have to say this usually about bad systems because people
do not believe that I can tell how bad a bad system sounds so
quickly [we all can, just go to Circuit City]. Now I have to apply
this statement to a great system - it would take a long, long time
to hear and characterize what this amp does really well and
potential faults, if any, this amp has. At $139K or so, they are
on our list but it will take us awhile to budget for them - and
until then we will just have to wonder. Wonder what this song
would sound like with the ML3, and what that one would sound
like....
As I mentioned in the 'dailies', for me this was a show about
two amps: the ML3 and the Audio Note* Kegon Balanced. We
will have the Kegon Balanced here, in the near future, and be able
to compare and contrast it to the Ongaku, the older high-gain
Kegons, and the ML2.1... and someday the ML3. It's All Good
as they say. |