Full Report
CES HIGH-END AUDIO

VENETIAN TOWER FLOOR 29
Wing 1

January 8th-11th, 2007

 

* product carried by Audio Federation

Copyright © Audio Federation, Inc.. All rights reserved.
All pictures in this report are freely copyable and distributable.

 

 

 

 
Here we have IAG America, audiolab, Mission, and Warfedale.

These photos were taken around noon on Wednesday, the 3rd day of the show. The first half of the single wing of the 30th floor had been visited on the first day, but on the second day we decided to visit the slums, I mean the regular conference rooms, on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th floors.

So this floor was a 'do or die trying' effort because the 4th and last day was being reserved for THE SHOW at the St. Tropez, which had gotten short thrift but I wanted to save it for the end and just be done with all the busses and taxiing and heavy camera lugging long walks getting to the other shows - in general things that were a waste of time because I can do those things anywhere, anytime. and the show is what is important these 4 days.

Anyway, taking the stairs down from the 30th floor I arrived at the end of the hall of what I will call Wing 1. It really has a alphabetic letter designation: A, B or C, but I have no idea which. The Venetian Tower arranges the hotel rooms into three 'wings', each of which, on this floor, contain numerous, NUMEROUS, rooms exhibiting high-end audio gear.

Some of which try to reproduce music.

Nawwwww, we are going to be nice.

 

 

 

 
This room was just a static display of what look like loudspeakers to me.

 

 

 

 
The Naim USA room. Sorry, people were using this room when I got here and for aforementioned reasons I was in P!A!N!I!C! mode, so I could only wait so long for people to settle down out of the pictures.

 

 

 

 
Interesting speakers. Kind of expensive but who am I to talk?

 

 

 

 
If I remember correctly, no music was playing during my flight through the Naim airspace.

 

 

 

 
The IAG America's QUAD room.

Music was playing here and it was quite nice - somewhat polite and sophisticated, but with a competency that makes me finally see what other people see in these speakers. For some reason, at shows these speakers are usually dull sounding and slow and muffled. But of the 3 rooms with Quad speakers - they all sounded pretty good.

 

 

 

 
I like the tweed look.

 

 

 

 
About half the rooms have this 'Innovation 2007' award. Kind of dilutes its meaning, don't ya think?

 

 

 

 
A profile shot of the QUAD loudspeaker.

 

 

 

 
I managed to take one photo of this room before Alon Wolf, the Magico designer / manufacturer / exhibitor said he did not want me taking photos of his room.

Why? Because he did not like what I said about the Magico Mini loudspeakers at the last CES.

Here is what I wrote:

"Magico speakers and Cat JL-2 amplifiers. Lots of people liked this sound but I found a heavy concentration of energy in the midrange, in a compressed, and uneven presentation, rapidly trailing off at the frequency extremes. Beautiful speakers and amps - but the sound just did not work at all for me here. There was another Magico system that had one of large Rowland amps driving it that we did not get to hear."

and

"Magico speakers, big Rowland amplifier. Considering I wrote elsewhere that I did not make it to this room - it was hardly memorable. Mostly I remember thinking "what's the fuss about these speakers? This system is just not showing them in their best light" This is a pretty large room - so that could have something to do with it, as we got burnt out on small monitor speakers in big rooms here after living with the Sonus Faber Extremas for many years.

'Course, the other Magico room was much smaller, but it had its own issues.

Silly me, I did not take a picture of the rack with the source equipment."

Alon seems like a nice, level-headed guy, but that is hardly very provocative. The first room reviewed had an *Edge Signature 1 preamp in the chain, which we sell.

Really, I am going to write what I hear, in as honest a way as the English language allows. I do not mean to eviscerate anybody. If someone thinks a review is unfair, email me, or post it on the blog if you want, and we can discuss it. Just don't threaten us or it will go up on the blog whether you like it or not.

OK, Alon did let me listen to the system in this room, which had the $150K Magico floor standers, and so here is what I heard.

I liked these better than the Magico Mini's, by which I mean that these speakers, I do not know their name, are a better value in my estimation in the $150K speaker market than are the Mini's in the $20K speaker market.

A lot of people spontaneously voiced their opinion that they did not like the sound in this room, saying that the sound was cool or the bass was disconnected from the rest of the frequency range. The fact that I thought it was better than that does not mean that I am trying to get Mr. Wolf to let me take and post photos of his rooms. At an estimated 8 days of 12 to 14 hours to get this report out - it probably saves me almost an hour NOT to take the photos, retouch them, crop, resize, and comment on them.

I presume next year I won't get to listen at all and save another hour [few rooms have $150K speakers that require this much introspection]. If all the exhibitors had this attitude I might actually get to just hang-out and enjoy a show or two :-)
 

Resolution    
Level of detail: 5=perfect   5
Micro-dynamics   6
Midi-dynamics   8
Macro-dynamics   8
Harmonic resolution   7
Harmonics    
Body / richness   9
Tonal accuracy   8
Dynamics    
Separation   8
Consistency top-to-bottom   9
Control   7 [but with the lowest octave decays being unnaturally extended]
Authority   8
Imaging    
Correctness   8
Separation   6.5
Transparency   5
Depth   N/A
Width   N/A
Off axis behavior   9
Solidity   6
Character    
Enjoyability   8
Emotionality   7 [although everyone I talked to thought this should be lower]
Reality   6.5 [really, the lack of transparency hurt here]
Magic   7 [I heard real potential, needs work though]
Impressiveness   8.5
Sophistication   8
Comments    
In the non-photo there is the ever-present dresser next to one of the speakers but the speaker's placement is not symmetrical, either from the front wall or the side walls, presumably to compensate for this furniture-burg. There was a lack of transparency here in that I was unable to convince myself that there might be real instruments 'out there'. Perhaps this was due to a lack of the ultimate in micro-dynamics, which might also account for some of the lack of emotionality and engagement that the sound seemed to have. There was also a hardness in the upper midrange / lower treble that stood out from the very competent handling of the other frequencies.

This sound was somewhat like that in the Hanson room, but with a greater level of detail and control of the dynamics. But there was something that drew one's attention particular frequency clusters - like seams in frequency response 'character', different frequencies sounding different, not in dynamics or level of detail but like some came from one type of material and some came from another.

Perhaps this is because we were sitting so nearfield at, oh, maybe [referencing the non-photo] 8 feet or so in front of the speakers. Or maybe the cables were of heterogeneous materials that transmitted different frequencies differently. Or maybe the rack had several different resonance frequencies that each affected the preamp in various ways. [OK, I admit it, I am making fun of all these speaker manufacturers who take full responsibility for the sound, no matter what system their progeny are in - and so then blast me when I comment on the sound in their room :-) Why isn't the power cord manufacturer writing me nasty emails , I want to know!].

What I liked a lot about this sound was the that there was a real balance between tone and detail - approaching that never-never land of the holy grail of being able to have both musicality and resolution (not to mention bass frosting on top). I did 'feel' various passages if the music - getting drawn in. And being in Photo Panic mode, a few other systems impressed me with their qualities and allowed me to breathe a sigh of relief on this floor, but none drew me in - and none impressed me that they might go beyond just a good system [in their current room and configuration] and approach those rare mystical magical musical experiences that we like to write about here.

Legend    
N/A means Not paying Attention [I wasn't paying attention to this]

For most scoring, 9 = best we ever heard. On Level of Detail, less than 5 implies a rounded note presentation, greater than 5 implies a distinct note presentation.

These impressions are just impressions, and apply to the whole system in combination to the room. Please do not misconstrue it as something else, especially you speaker manufacturers.

Impressive - Exaggerated bass and/or detail and/or dynamics
Sophisticated - Detailed and with finesse
Enjoyable - Nice to listen to, pleasant
Sweet - Exaggerated harmonics and/or warmth
Emotional - Music often pulls at heart strings
Real/Truth - Transparent, accurate
Magical/Spiritual - Precipitates psychological effects other than what might be expected

 

 

 

 

 

 
The Bel Canto Design room

 

 

 

 
The On Track Audio room

 

 

 

 
The Burmester room.

The all Burmester system sounded better than it has in recent years, richer with more harmonic content - and a little warmer. I have no idea which of the two pairs of speakers were playing, however [in the past we have heard the big boys].

 

 

 

 
A photo from the listening position.

 

 

 

 
Vivid Audio with Crystal Cable. Halco amplification. Didn't get to hear this room, but we have heard (and photographed) the Vivid speakers in the past and liked the sound of the systems they were in.

 

 

 

 
The Harmonic Technology, Channel Islands Audio room.

 

 

 

 
Musical Surrounding's Pathos Acoustics room.

Don't remember the sound in this room - but I took a lot of photos of the Pathos gear. Very photogenic.

 

 

 

 
Pathos amp....

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The System electronics.

 

 

 

 
The static display we are about to visit....

 

 

 

 
The Digit hyrid CD player. Looks like dust on the front there. And where is the trademark red? Still cool looking though...

 

 

 

 
The Classic One MK III

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

?
 
The Prima Luna room with Sonus Faber Amati speakers.

 

 

 

 
The Musical Surrounding's Clearaudio room.

 

 

 

 
The big statement Clearaudio turntable.

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio Statement turntable.

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio Statement turntable.

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio Statement turntable.

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio Statement turntable, closer...

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio Statement turntable, very close...

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio Statement turntable, bottom pendulum...

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio Statement turntable, eclipsing Treasure Island.

 

 

 

 
The Clearaudio turntable meeting...

 

 

 

 
The DH Labs and Prima Luna room

 

 

 

 
The Westlake Audio room.

 

 

 

 
A few pics of the Westlake speakers.

 

 

 

 
The Boulder amp doing the amping.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The Aesthetix Audio room with Vandersteen 5A speakers

 

 

 

 
The all Aesthetix front end, excepting the turntable.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The Musical Surrounding's Michael Yee Audio room.

 

 

 

 
The Focus Audio, Vitus Audio room. Sure would like to hear these speakers with something else. And the amps with different speakers, too.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The finish on these smaller Focus Audio loudspeakers is very wild.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The finish on these loudspeakers, is this a real wood burl? But I like it...

 

 

 

 
The traditional Merlin speakers with Joule amplification room. Cardas cabling. *Audio Aero Capitole Reference cD player.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The Renaissance Audio Group room with what looks like their speakers and McCormack electronics.

 

 

 

 
The second Focus Audio  (with Vivid Audio electronics) room. I am purposely leaving the photo of the sign at the too large size to remind me that maybe I will make them all this size next year. Looks good, and easy to find. A little hard on the download times, but....

 

 

 

 
The Zanden Audio room. Didn't get a chance to listen in this room. Sucks.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The Gershman Acoustics, Magnan Cables and Red Rock Audio room.

 

 

 

 
The sound was definitively of the round note variety, but well-controlled. The room was pressurized fairly well, and the sound was enjoyable, somewhat impressive and emotional.

I am beginning to see the world as divided into two camps: those that (1) really must have rounded notes along with a room-pressurizing sound, and those that (2) must have high resolution, discrete notes with a soundstage laid out in front of them.

And then there is the rest of us independents who have to agonize over each system, judging it on its own particular merits.

Anyway, I finally understand what people see in these Gershman speaker systems.

 

 

 

 
The Gershman Black Swan loudspekaer.

 

 

 

 
The Red Rock Audio 'Renaissance' amplifier.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
One of many circumstances where I couldn't decide which photo to use so I just included both.

 

 

 

 
The Argento Acoustics (cables) room. Tidal Contriva speakers, Oracle electronics, and *Acoustic Dreams equipment rack.

The sound of this system, such as this poor listener was able to hear it during his short stay off-axis, is Sophisticated and Enjoyable. The midrange had a beautiful delicacy, but with real world bass and flat frequency response top to bottom.

We are talking about the system sound here - and, given what I know about these speakers, they like, and are a reasonably clear window on, high-quality electronics upstream.

 

 

 

 
Tidal Contriva speaker

 

 

 

 
The electronics.

 

 

 

 
Tidal Contriva speaker

 

 

 

 
Tidal Contriva speaker

 

 

 

 
The Argento cable display.

 

 

 

 
The MSB Technology room with non-spherical MSB loudspeakers. Last year at CES they had displayed their spherical speakers.

This room, running off the iPod, sounded reasonably good. I didn't get to sit and check out transparency or anything, and it wasn't playing very loud, but there was good dynamic separation and a sweet tunefulness that really didn't suck.

Once they make a way to get the digital off of one of these in a reasonable fashion, and make the iPod display readable to someone besides 20 somethings, the CD will be in (even more) trouble.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The Penaudio room. These sound here was OK, though you can hear more of the system itself compared to the music than in many other rooms at the show.

 

 

 

 
Is it just me or is this photo (especially if it was taken such that the city in the background was more visible - i.e. a longer exposure time) really representative of what a real person in a high-rise would want in their room? Visually I mean.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The prototype of a new speaker from Penaudio

 

 

 

 
The Vandersteen, *Harmonic Resolution Systems (HRS) room.

OK folks, I am going to submit you to quite a few photos of the prototype of the new SXR equipment rack from HRS.

People who know us, or of HRS, know that HRS does not fool around when it comes to making equipment racks that address the deleterious effects induced by vibrations generated by loudspeakers (and sometimes even heavy footed men and women) on electronic and mechanical high-end audio equipment.

Whoa, that sentence is too long for 5:30am, and I don't want to go back and reread it to see if it makes sense, so onward...so let's just get on with the pictures, already.

 

 

 

 
The display of HRS Nimbus Couplers and Damping Plates.

 

 

 

 
The new, but still in prototype stage, SXR equipment rack. It is to be about one half of the price of their MXR equipment rack.

 

 

 

 
The SXR from above.

 

 

 

 
The SXR with the MXR in the background.

 

 

 

 
The MXR equipment rack in birds-eye maple veneer.

 

 

 

 
The SXR ...

 

 

 

 
The SXR. No really, this photo is different than the last one...

 

 

 

 
The SXR is completely configurable so if an owner ever upgrades to the MXR, the SXR 'shelf supports' can be used as an amp stand. From somewhat theoretical foundations it is expected that equipment on HRS M3 platforms (shelves) these used as amp stands will indeed sound better on these than on the carpet where we have them now. We'll have to do the actual listening tests when we get these in.

The M3 has always worked really well on carpet for us, but if we can make it sound even better? And there is an improved aesthetics about getting the whole thing higher off of the floor. If you have a smooth and flat hardwood floor, it is more unclear if there will be much improvement, since the feet of your  M3 are already on a firm surface.

This thing weighs, and I am estimating based on weights of various dumbbells I lift, about 25 - 30 lbs?

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
The second Vandersteen room with their Quattro speakers driven by what looks like Ayre electronics.

 

 

 

 
The system electronics with Audio Research electronics and Clearaudio turntable on a *HRS MXR equipment rack in gloss black, just like ours here :-)

End of Wing One.

Actually, the Vandy rooms were  kind of the in the middle of the 3 wings of the tower - and I almost missed them, walking by them completely the first time, only later wondering if there might be 'stuff' in these rooms.

 

 

 

* product carried by Audio Federation

Copyright © Audio Federation, Inc.. All rights reserved.
All pictures in this report are freely copyable and distributable.

 

Home Magazine Store Rate My HiFi

Guides

Blog