<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jorma Design &#8216;Prime&#8217; interconnect</title>
	<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/99</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Jorma Design &#8216;Prime&#8217; interconnect by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/99#comment-361</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/99#comment-361</guid>
					<description>Hi Remy,

Cold, out of the box the Jorma Prime speaker cable sounded a lot like the Jorma Prime interconnects did when they were cold.

After about 12 hours we swapped the Nordost Valhalla speaker cable back in the system and I thought. me being the only one there at the time :-), that the Prime was better (more(!) resolution, harmonic content, PRaT, etc.) than the Valhalla [you should have been there then, Steve!].

But both Prime interconnects and speaker cables were getting steadily, but oh... so... slowly..., better, just like cables that haven't been broken in all the way, yet. So, in order to reduce the potential, epoc-like breakin time for el impatient one (me)  from months to weeks, they are both now on the new Nordost Vidar cable burn-in device (which seems to do a really good job breaking-in things).

Take care,
Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Remy,</p>
	<p>Cold, out of the box the Jorma Prime speaker cable sounded a lot like the Jorma Prime interconnects did when they were cold.</p>
	<p>After about 12 hours we swapped the Nordost Valhalla speaker cable back in the system and I thought. me being the only one there at the time <img src='http://audiofederation.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> , that the Prime was better (more(!) resolution, harmonic content, PRaT, etc.) than the Valhalla [you should have been there then, Steve!].</p>
	<p>But both Prime interconnects and speaker cables were getting steadily, but oh&#8230; so&#8230; slowly&#8230;, better, just like cables that haven&#8217;t been broken in all the way, yet. So, in order to reduce the potential, epoc-like breakin time for el impatient one (me)  from months to weeks, they are both now on the new Nordost Vidar cable burn-in device (which seems to do a really good job breaking-in things).</p>
	<p>Take care,<br />
Mike.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Jorma Design &#8216;Prime&#8217; interconnect by: Remy</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/99#comment-360</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/99#comment-360</guid>
					<description>Hi,

I was just wandering what impressions the Jorma Prime speaker cables have left on you, cold out of the box? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi,</p>
	<p>I was just wandering what impressions the Jorma Prime speaker cables have left on you, cold out of the box? Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
