<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CES 2008 Winds Down&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/423</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on CES 2008 Winds Down&#8230; by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/423#comment-2873</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/423#comment-2873</guid>
					<description>Hey Romy,

OK. We never heard the ML2 nor L1 here, and, though you and a handful of people mention that these were special I am not sure I have heard anybody describe exactly why and how - especially people who have heard the latest offerings extensively.

If we are members of the 'audio public', please let the 'audio public' know about it. 

The Lamm product cycle is pretty darn long, about 5 to 7 years. Hopefully we, meaning Audio Federation, will be able to figure SOMETHING out in that time.

The ML3 is at least more interesting than 99% of the other product releases that we are all inundated with vis-a-vis shows and trade rags. The bar is low, I admit.

Regards right back atchya,
Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Romy,</p>
	<p>OK. We never heard the ML2 nor L1 here, and, though you and a handful of people mention that these were special I am not sure I have heard anybody describe exactly why and how - especially people who have heard the latest offerings extensively.</p>
	<p>If we are members of the &#8216;audio public&#8217;, please let the &#8216;audio public&#8217; know about it. </p>
	<p>The Lamm product cycle is pretty darn long, about 5 to 7 years. Hopefully we, meaning Audio Federation, will be able to figure SOMETHING out in that time.</p>
	<p>The ML3 is at least more interesting than 99% of the other product releases that we are all inundated with vis-a-vis shows and trade rags. The bar is low, I admit.</p>
	<p>Regards right back atchya,<br />
Mike.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on CES 2008 Winds Down&#8230; by: RomyTheCat</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/423#comment-2871</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/423#comment-2871</guid>
					<description>***  Well, the Lamm ML3 but that was on the Wilson MAXX II which requires some listening around - and besides, it will take years to get the full measure of these amps.

I do not think that you will. The Lamm ML2 and Lamm L1 came and gone without audio public have any remote understanding what it was.  The same will be with ML3 – it will come and go and the primitive audio consciousness will not be figure out what it was all about. It is in case if there was something “interesting” in ML3 to begin with, what is at this point is an open question.

Rgs, Romy the caT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>***  Well, the Lamm ML3 but that was on the Wilson MAXX II which requires some listening around - and besides, it will take years to get the full measure of these amps.</p>
	<p>I do not think that you will. The Lamm ML2 and Lamm L1 came and gone without audio public have any remote understanding what it was.  The same will be with ML3 – it will come and go and the primitive audio consciousness will not be figure out what it was all about. It is in case if there was something “interesting” in ML3 to begin with, what is at this point is an open question.</p>
	<p>Rgs, Romy the caT
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
