<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE STEREOTIMES CES 2006 SHOW REPORT</title>
	<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/42</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on THE STEREOTIMES CES 2006 SHOW REPORT by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/42#comment-75</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/42#comment-75</guid>
					<description>Hello there, Ben,

I think I've gotten Frank into enough trouble - suffice it to say that most reviews, and it is a long-stading tradition at Stereophile, say what they really think in the last 1 or 2 paragraphs. But you have to read EVERY word and put that word into context by comparing it with all the other words they could have used there instead. 

The report held the Lumenwhite speakers up to the highest standards, as it was probably in the top 5 most expensive systems at the show - but it nevertheless was one of the best sounding....in the top 5% say, and maybe top 1% of the rooms that Mark appears to have visited. Sometimes the show reports out there give 'best of shows' to room that are not in the top 1/2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hello there, Ben,</p>
	<p>I think I&#8217;ve gotten Frank into enough trouble - suffice it to say that most reviews, and it is a long-stading tradition at Stereophile, say what they really think in the last 1 or 2 paragraphs. But you have to read EVERY word and put that word into context by comparing it with all the other words they could have used there instead. </p>
	<p>The report held the Lumenwhite speakers up to the highest standards, as it was probably in the top 5 most expensive systems at the show - but it nevertheless was one of the best sounding&#8230;.in the top 5% say, and maybe top 1% of the rooms that Mark appears to have visited. Sometimes the show reports out there give &#8216;best of shows&#8217; to room that are not in the top 1/2.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on THE STEREOTIMES CES 2006 SHOW REPORT by: Ben Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/42#comment-74</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/42#comment-74</guid>
					<description>Hey Mike &amp;#38; Neli,
i read through Franks show report. i would like to know if you could share a little about what may be between the lines. i think you had commented that the Lumen White speakers were nasaly and uneven. i have seen several reports that comment positivly on the King electrostsatics..
did you visit the audiopax room? what are your impressions? also do you have any experiance with vmps? they seem to get a wide variety of comments. one more.. the Lipinsky speakers have had good coverage. did you get to visit their room?
thank you in advance for your time again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Mike &amp; Neli,<br />
i read through Franks show report. i would like to know if you could share a little about what may be between the lines. i think you had commented that the Lumen White speakers were nasaly and uneven. i have seen several reports that comment positivly on the King electrostsatics..<br />
did you visit the audiopax room? what are your impressions? also do you have any experiance with vmps? they seem to get a wide variety of comments. one more.. the Lipinsky speakers have had good coverage. did you get to visit their room?<br />
thank you in advance for your time again!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
