Thank you for your reply!
Will there always be tradeoffs when choosing for a 3 way system?
I do miss a little bass with my current speakers, am very much looking for the above mentioned speakers for a reasonable price secondhand, and sometimes think about the same, but 3way system
I loved the CRM 3.2 FE a lot, also the soundstage, precision and detail. Would I have to compromise on that?

Sincerely,

Gaston

The minis, in comparison with the 3.2FE, are more involving [I hesitate to say warmer, but they have more color in the harmonics, more ability to produce more of that addictive Kharma sound], the better cabinetry lends itself to more solidity to all of the notes and the ability to fill a larger space with sound, and, yes, the tweeter/crossover lends itself to more resolution in what is already a high-resolution speaker… etc. etc.

They are like the 3.2FE but improved in all the ways that make the 3.2 great [except price].

The way I think of it is that the 3.2FE is an amazingly good deal. You get one of the best sounding, best integrated, most involving speakers ever at a price that is very, very competitive.

The Mini is for people who love that 3.2 sound, and want the ultimate expression of that sound. It is a world class speaker that still fits in small to medium-sized rooms.

The midi is for people with a larger space who want more bass at the expense of the necessary trade offs associated with going from a 2-way to a 3-way.

Could you tell me the difference between the Mini and the CRM 3.2 FE ?
I heard the latter with Kronzilla end amps and realy loved them and can hardly imagine that the Mini’s will sound so much better that one will happily put down another 25.000 extra?
And could putting the diamond tweeter in the 3.2 have some effect?

Thanx for your reply!

Gaston

We sent you an email with all the nitty gritty details…

Thanks,
Mike.