<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annoucement: Lamm ML3 Signature Power Amplifier</title>
	<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/254</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Annoucement: Lamm ML3 Signature Power Amplifier by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/254#comment-977</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/254#comment-977</guid>
					<description>Hi '6',

:-)

Looking at their prices, they all end in '90'$, and the ML2.1 ends in '290'$, so I guess ....

Given the overall (aka large) price they are pretty much free to do whatever they want with the last 3 digits of the price without affecting the overall value of the amplifier. 

So, yeah, what numbers would you pick? Let's see, we have '123'. Nah, too pedestrian.

How about '789'? Then we would have $126,789.00. Nah, that is too stupid.

'999' is too boring, everyone does that.

So it is down to either '290' and '000'?

Actually, considering that the ML2.1 is 29290, these should be 126260.

Yep, I am happy with that. And it is only a $30 difference. They were so close!

And, '6', should you every want to buy these, we will offer you 100% trade in on your ML2.1's :-) [Just so you know, no pressure or anything :-) ]

Take care,
Mike (I think Neli is calling you from her car as we speak, Say 'hi!' to her for me :-) ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi &#8216;6&#8242;,</p>
	<p>:-)</p>
	<p>Looking at their prices, they all end in &#8216;90&#8242;$, and the ML2.1 ends in &#8216;290&#8242;$, so I guess &#8230;.</p>
	<p>Given the overall (aka large) price they are pretty much free to do whatever they want with the last 3 digits of the price without affecting the overall value of the amplifier. </p>
	<p>So, yeah, what numbers would you pick? Let&#8217;s see, we have &#8216;123&#8242;. Nah, too pedestrian.</p>
	<p>How about &#8216;789&#8242;? Then we would have $126,789.00. Nah, that is too stupid.</p>
	<p>&#8216;999&#8242; is too boring, everyone does that.</p>
	<p>So it is down to either &#8216;290&#8242; and &#8216;000&#8242;?</p>
	<p>Actually, considering that the ML2.1 is 29290, these should be 126260.</p>
	<p>Yep, I am happy with that. And it is only a $30 difference. They were so close!</p>
	<p>And, &#8216;6&#8242;, should you every want to buy these, we will offer you 100% trade in on your ML2.1&#8217;s <img src='http://audiofederation.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  [Just so you know, no pressure or anything <img src='http://audiofederation.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ]</p>
	<p>Take care,<br />
Mike (I think Neli is calling you from her car as we speak, Say &#8216;hi!&#8217; to her for me <img src='http://audiofederation.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Annoucement: Lamm ML3 Signature Power Amplifier by: 6eye</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/254#comment-976</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/254#comment-976</guid>
					<description>Why charge the extra $290.00?  What's with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why charge the extra $290.00?  What&#8217;s with that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
