<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-End Audio System Optimization Techniques&#8230; continued</title>
	<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/182</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on High-End Audio System Optimization Techniques&#8230; continued by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/182#comment-706</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/182#comment-706</guid>
					<description>Hi Steve,

True, the earlier in life one has a decent system [aka a decent initial seed] - the sooner they will 'most likely' get to a great system.

I guess the genetic algorithm approach might be akin to have a friend / dealer who has a great system and trying to merge their system with yours resulting in an offspring of the two - and then hearing another great system... and repeating the process.

Yeah, there have been requests for a 'VW microbus customization' like application for audio system configuration and visualization... mostly from Neli :-)

I fear that the problem with getting a 'bunch of initial seed configurations from users' is that it is no better of a seeding than generating a system configuration from a random sample of components - i.e. how to reduce the noise level in the sample set without offending people bu rejecting their 'seed' from inclusion in the sample ... 

Thanks for the interesting ideas. Makes one think...

Take care,
MIke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Steve,</p>
	<p>True, the earlier in life one has a decent system [aka a decent initial seed] - the sooner they will &#8216;most likely&#8217; get to a great system.</p>
	<p>I guess the genetic algorithm approach might be akin to have a friend / dealer who has a great system and trying to merge their system with yours resulting in an offspring of the two - and then hearing another great system&#8230; and repeating the process.</p>
	<p>Yeah, there have been requests for a &#8216;VW microbus customization&#8217; like application for audio system configuration and visualization&#8230; mostly from Neli <img src='http://audiofederation.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
	<p>I fear that the problem with getting a &#8216;bunch of initial seed configurations from users&#8217; is that it is no better of a seeding than generating a system configuration from a random sample of components - i.e. how to reduce the noise level in the sample set without offending people bu rejecting their &#8217;seed&#8217; from inclusion in the sample &#8230; </p>
	<p>Thanks for the interesting ideas. Makes one think&#8230;</p>
	<p>Take care,<br />
MIke.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on High-End Audio System Optimization Techniques&#8230; continued by: scorch123</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/182#comment-705</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/182#comment-705</guid>
					<description>SA applied to audio &quot;solutions&quot; is an interesting idea.  It reminds me of an earlier post about shuffling equipment around at CES at midnight.  With SA, the initial &quot;seed&quot; solution significantly impacts the solution runtime.  What may be more effective is a genetic algorithmic approach...

Soooo...

Someone should write an audiophile &quot;selecta&quot; program, similar to this one for VW microbus customization:

http://www.busselecta.com/bus/

You would get a bunch of initial seed configurations from users.  Compare that to the combinations generated from the GA approach...

- Steve O.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>SA applied to audio &#8220;solutions&#8221; is an interesting idea.  It reminds me of an earlier post about shuffling equipment around at CES at midnight.  With SA, the initial &#8220;seed&#8221; solution significantly impacts the solution runtime.  What may be more effective is a genetic algorithmic approach&#8230;</p>
	<p>Soooo&#8230;</p>
	<p>Someone should write an audiophile &#8220;selecta&#8221; program, similar to this one for VW microbus customization:</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.busselecta.com/bus/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.busselecta.com/bus/</a></p>
	<p>You would get a bunch of initial seed configurations from users.  Compare that to the combinations generated from the GA approach&#8230;</p>
	<p>- Steve O.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
