<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emm Labs Signature editions - interim update</title>
	<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/119</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Emm Labs Signature editions - interim update by: trcnet</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/119#comment-559</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 05:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/119#comment-559</guid>
					<description>Hi Mike,

Thanks!  I appreciate you taking the time to get back to me.  Glad to hear the EMM combo is starting to breathe and letting go of the notes.  I'm sure looking forward to this upgrade, IMO the EMM combo is already so darn good.   After I've had mine for awhile and it has settled in,  I'll write back with my thoughts.

All the best!
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Mike,</p>
	<p>Thanks!  I appreciate you taking the time to get back to me.  Glad to hear the EMM combo is starting to breathe and letting go of the notes.  I&#8217;m sure looking forward to this upgrade, IMO the EMM combo is already so darn good.   After I&#8217;ve had mine for awhile and it has settled in,  I&#8217;ll write back with my thoughts.</p>
	<p>All the best!<br />
Tom
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Emm Labs Signature editions - interim update by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/119#comment-556</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 04:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/119#comment-556</guid>
					<description>Hi Tom,

The Emm Labs combo is doing well, and we are enjoying the added resolution both in the midrange and, lately, the bass - especially with associated components that may be a little weak in that area. The added bass detail is not 'articiially flavored' like so many other 'bass rich' digital is these days, either.

So, yes, the combo is continuing to relax and open up - and it has progessed enough that we do not run it 24x7 anymore - even though we feel it has at least a little more to go until it is fully broken in.

Thanks for the encouragement!

Take care,
Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Tom,</p>
	<p>The Emm Labs combo is doing well, and we are enjoying the added resolution both in the midrange and, lately, the bass - especially with associated components that may be a little weak in that area. The added bass detail is not &#8216;articiially flavored&#8217; like so many other &#8216;bass rich&#8217; digital is these days, either.</p>
	<p>So, yes, the combo is continuing to relax and open up - and it has progessed enough that we do not run it 24&#215;7 anymore - even though we feel it has at least a little more to go until it is fully broken in.</p>
	<p>Thanks for the encouragement!</p>
	<p>Take care,<br />
Mike.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Emm Labs Signature editions - interim update by: trcnet</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/119#comment-555</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/119#comment-555</guid>
					<description>Hi Mike &amp;#38; Neli,

I just wanted to see how the new Signature EMM combo is doing.  My DAC-6 is going in for the Signature upgrade next week.  BTW, I really enjoy your site, you guys ooze entusiasm..............  Thanks

All the best,
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Mike &amp; Neli,</p>
	<p>I just wanted to see how the new Signature EMM combo is doing.  My DAC-6 is going in for the Signature upgrade next week.  BTW, I really enjoy your site, you guys ooze entusiasm&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..  Thanks</p>
	<p>All the best,<br />
Tom
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
